Hukum Talak Khaṭā’ dalam Perspektif Mazhab Hanafi dan Mazhab Syafii
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36701/fikrah.v2i3.2604Keywords:
Erroneous Divorce, Divorce Law, Hanafi School, Syafii School, Comparative FiqhAbstract
Khaṭā’ Divorce is a form of divorce pronounced by a husband to his wife unintentionally, due to a mistake in speech, being in a state of impaired consciousness, or because of certain circumstances that affect his will and awareness. In other words, khaṭā’ divorce occurs as a result of an error, inadvertence, or unintentionality whether in the utterance or in the intention to pronounce the divorce. This study examines the legal status of khaṭā’ divorce according to the Hanafi and Shafi’i schools of thought and provides a comparative analysis between their respective views, using the methodological approaches of both schools. This type of divorce has sparked differences of opinion among scholars, especially regarding the validity of a divorce uttered unintentionally or without a clear intention. This research employs a normative qualitative method through a literature review of classical and contemporary sources of Islamic jurisprudence, applying a comparative approach to analyze the differing perspectives of the two schools. The objectives are: first, to explain the Hanafi view on khaṭā’ divorce; second, to explain the Shafi’i view on khaṭā’ divorce; and third, to compare the differing opinions of both schools. The results of the study indicate that the Hanafi school deems the divorce valid as long as it is pronounced with a clear (ṣarīḥ) utterance, without considering the intention, emphasizing legal certainty. In contrast, the Shafi’i school requires intention and full awareness as essential elements, thus regarding a divorce without conscious intent as invalid. This difference reflects contrasting approaches: the Hanafi’s formalistic and textual approach versus the Shafi’i’s substantive and ethical approach. In the context of family law in Indonesia, the Shafi’i approach is considered more applicable and solution-oriented as it takes into account psychological aspects and family protection. The implications of this research contribute to the development of comparative jurisprudence and offer a foundation for contemporary ijtihād in handling cases of unintentional divorce.
Downloads
References
Al-Qur’ān al-Karīm
Buku
Al-Anṣārī, Zakariyya. Asnā al-Maṭālib fī Syarḥ Rawḍ al-Ṭālib. Juz 3. Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī, 1313 H.
Al-Baghdādī, Abū Bakr Aḥmad ibn ʿAlī ibn ṡābit al-Khaṭīb. Tārīkh Baghdādi. Tahqiq Basyar ʿAwwād Maʿrūf. Juz 15. Cet. 1; Beirut: Dār al-Gharb al-Islāmī, 2002.
Al-Bayhaqī. Abū Bakr Aḥmad ibn al-Ḥusayn. Manāqib al-Syāfiʿī al-Bayhaqī. Juz 1. Cet. I; Kairo: Maktabah Dār al-Turāṡ, 1390 H/1970 M.
Al-Bukhārī, Muḥammad ibn Ismā‘īl. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Kitāb al-Bay‘ah, Bāb al-Niyyah. Hadits No. 1. Madinah: Maktabah al-Maṭbū‘āt al-Islāmiyyah, t.th.
Al-Ḥabashī , Ibn Manẓūr. Lisān al-ʿArab, ʿAbd Allāh ed. Juz 14. Cet. III; Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 1994.
Al-Ḥalabī, Qutb ad-Dīn ‘Abd al-Karīm ibn ‘Abd al-Nūr. Al-Badr al-Munīr al-Sārī fī al-Kalām ‘alā Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. ed. Khālid ‘Abd al-‘Aẓīm al-Ḥuwaynī. Majalah Turats Nabawi. No. 3. Muḥarram 1440 H.
ʿIbn ʿĀbidīn. Radd al-Muḥtār ʿala al-Durr al-Mukhtā. Juz 3. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1992.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. London: Islamic Texts Society, 2008.
Al-Kāsānī ,‘Alā’ al-Dīn Abū Bakr ibn Mas‘ūd. Bada’i al-Sana’i fi Tartib al-Syarā’i‘. Juz 3. Cet. II; Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1986 M/1406 H.
Al-Kāsānī ,‘Alā’ al-Dīn Abū Bakr ibn Mas‘ūd. Bada’i al-Sana’i fi Tartib al-Syarā’i‘. Juz 3. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2003.
Kementerian Agama R.I. Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahannya. Jakarta: Lajnah Pentashihan Mushaf Al-Qur’an, 2019.
Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI). Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pembinaan Kelembagaan Agama Islam, 1991.
Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI). Pasal 115. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pembinaan Kelembagaan Agama Islam, 1991.
Al-Margīnānī, Burhān al-dīn abū al-hasan. Al-Hidāyah fī Syaraḥ Bidāyah al-Mubtadī. Juz 1. Cet I; Beirut: Dār Iḥyā al-Turās al-Arabī, 2004 M/1425 H.
Al-Marghīnānī, Burhān al-Dīn. Al-Hidāyah Fī Syaraḥ Bidāyah al-Mubtadī. Juz 3. Cet. I; Madinah al-Munawwarah: Dār al-Sirāj, 1440 H/2019 M.
Al-Marghīnānī, Burhan al-Din. Al-Hidayah Syarah Bidayat al-Mubtad. Tahqiq Muhammad Amin. Juz 1. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1465 H/ 2004 H.
Al-Māwardī, Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad ibn Ḥabīb al-Baṣrī. Al-Iqnāʿ fī al-Fiqh al-Syāfiʿī. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, t.th.
Al-Muṭī‘ī, Muḥammad Najīb. Al-Majmūʿ Syaraḥ al-Muḥażżab-Takmilah al-Muṭī‘ī al-Ūlā. Juz 17. Jeddah: Maṭba‘ah al-Irsyād, 1995.
Al-Nawawī. Rawḍat al-Ṭālibīn wa ‘Umdat al-Muftīn. Jilid 8. Cet. VIII; Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1991 M/ 1412 H.
Al-Nawawī, Yaḥyā ibn Ṣaraf. Syaraḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, Juz 13. Cet. II; Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, 1996.
Nurlan, Fausiah. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. CV. Pilar Nusantara, 2019.
Al-Ramlī, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Nihāyat al-Muḥtāj ilā Syaraḥ al-Minhāj. juz 6. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1984 M.
Al-Samarqand. ʿAlāʾ al-Dīn. Tuhfat al-Fuqahāʾ. Juz 2. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1996.
Al-Shirbīnī. Mughnī al-Muḥtāj ilā Maʿrifat Maʿānī Alfāẓ al-Minhāj. Juz 4. Cet. I; Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1995.
Al-Sijistānī, Abū Dāwūd, Sulaimān ibn al-Asyʿaṡ ibn Isḥāq ibn Basyīr al-Azdī. Sunan Abī Dāwūd syārah ʿAun al-Maʿbūd. No. hadis: 2194. Juz 2. India: al-Maṭbaʿah al-Anṣāriyyah, 1323 H.
Al-Subkī, Syekh al-Islām ʿAlī ibn ʿAbd al-Kāfī. Al-Ibhāj fī Syarḥ al-Minhāj. Juz 2. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1404 H / 1984 M.
Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn ‘Abdu al-Rahman. Al-Asybāh wa al-Naẓāʾir. tahqiq Muhammad Abū al-Faḍl Ibrāhīm. Cet. 1; Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1403 H/1983 M.
Al-Syāfi‘ī, Muhammad ibn Idris. Al-Risālah, al-Muntaqā min Kalām al-Imām al- Syāfi‘ī. Tahkīq Muḥammad al-Zuḥailī. Cet. I; Damaskus: Dār al-Qalam, 1998.
Al-Syāfi‘ī. Muḥammad ibn Idrīs. Al-Risālah. Tahqiq Ahmad Muhammad Syākir. Cet. I; Kairo: Maṭba‘ah Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Awlād, 1357 H/1938 M.
Al-Syāfi‘ī, Muḥammad ibn Idrīs. Al-Umm. Tahqīq Rif‘at Fawzī ‘Abd al-Muṭṭalib. Juz 6. Beirut: Dār al-Wafā’, 2001.
Al-Tirmidzī, Muḥammad ibn ‘Īsā. Sunan al-Tirmidzī, tahqīq Aḥmad Muḥammad Syākir. no. hadis 1184. Juz 3. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāṡ al-‘Arabī, 1995.
Al-Żahabī, Abū ‘Abdullāh Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Uṡmān. Manāqib Abī Ḥanīfah. Tahqiq Muḥammad Zāhid al-Kawṡarī. Cet. III; India: Iḥyā’ al-Ma‘ārif an-Nu‘māniyyah, 1408 H.
Al-Zuhaili, Wahbah. Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Juz 1. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, 1998.
Al-Zuḥailī, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuhu: al-Aḥwāl al-Sykhṣiyyah. Juz 7. Cet. II; Damaskus: Dar al-Fikr, 1404 H/1974 M.
Jurnal Ilmiah:
Alfiannor, Imam, et al. "Hukum Talak yang Dijatuhkan oleh Suami karena dipaksa Menurut Mazhab Hanafi dan Mazhab Syāfi‘ī." Journal of Islamic and Law Studies 2, no. 1 (2018). h. 129-139, doi: https://doi.org/10.18592/jils.v2i1.4696. https://jurnal.uin-antasari.ac.id/index.php/jils/article/view/4696.
Djawas, Mursyid Djawas, Azka Amalia Jihad, and Kemala Dewi. "Hukum Talak dalam Kondisi Mabuk Perspektif Ibn Rusyd." El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 4, no. 1 (2021): h. 1-17. doi: https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v4i1.8567 https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/usrah/article/view/8567.
Fikri, Fikri, et al. "Kontekstualisasi Cerai Talak dalam Fikih dan Hukum Nasional di Indonesia." Al-Ulum 19, no. 1 (2019): h. 151-170, doi: https://doi.org/10.30603/au.v19i1.643 https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/au/article/view/643.
Hanafi, Aqsol Zidan, and Khoirul Ahsan. "Hukum Penjatuhan Talak dengan Bahasa Kiasan dalam Prespektif Mazhab Syafii dan Hukum Positif." Rayah al-Islam 8, no. 3 (2024): 1452-1465. h. 1452-1465. https://ejournal.arraayah.ac.id/index.php/rais/article/view/1088.
Idfi, Mezi Watdila. "Penerapan Sharih dan Kinayah dalam Perceraian." Sakena: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 9, no. 2 (2024): h. 46-55. https://journals.fasya.uinib.org/index.php/sakena/article/view/647.
Idris, Muhammad Nirwan, and Kurnaemi Anita. "Forced Divorce Polemic: Comparative Analysis of the Hanafi and Shafii Schools of Thought." Nukhbatul'ulum: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam 10, no. 1 (2024): h. 1-23, doi: https://doi.org/10.36701/nukhbah.v10i1.1073, https://journal.stiba.ac.id/index.php/nukhbah/article/view/1073.
Ningrum, Ita Sofia. "Dasar-Dasar Para Ulama dalam Berijtihad dan Metode Istinbāţh Hukum." Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 5, no. 1 (2018): h. 93-108, Doi: https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v5i1.197 https://www.jurnalfai-uikabogor.org/index.php/mizan/article/view/197.
Noor, Muhammad. “Konsep Talak dalam Keadaan Marah dalam Perspektif Ibnu Qayyim AL-Jauzi”. Jurnal 4, no. 1 (2016). https://jht.politala.ac.id/index.php/jht/article/download/5/5.
Rohmah, Anny Nailatur, and Ashif Az Zafi. "Jejak Eksistensi Mazhab Syafii di Indonesia." Jurnal Tamaddun: Jurnal Sejarah dan Kebudayaan Islam 8, no. 1 (2020): h. 173-192. https://www.academia.edu/download/78008401/pdf_8.pdf.
Siregar, Idris, Nur Tasya Hariany Sitorus, and Tari Nur Fajri. "Talaq Menurut Perspektif Hukum dan Sosial dalam Konteks Islam." Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora 2, no. 3 (2024): h. 163-172, doi: https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1367 https://journal.staiypiqbaubau.ac.id/index.php/Mandub/article/view/1367.
Skripsi, dan Tesis:
Rohman, Mujibu.“Talak dalam Keadaan Marah Perspektif Maqasid Syari’ah Jasser ‘Auda” . Tesis. Malang: UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2019.
Octavia, Herlinda. “Metode Istinbath Hukum Mazhab Syafii dalam Talak Paksa”. Skripsi. Curup: Fak. Syari’ah dan Ekonomi Islam IAIN, 2020.
Situs, dan Sumber Online:
Islamweb, "Talak dapat terjadi melalui niat, ucapan, atau perbuatan, bagi siapa saja yang melakukannya dengan pengetahuan, kesengajaan, dan kehendak bebas." https://www.islamweb.net/ar/fatwa/129105 (16 November 2009).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zasmita Noviyanti, Andi Indra Puteri, Ainil Maqsurah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






