Tradisi A’ Buang-buang di Desa Lembanna Perspektif Fikih Muamalah

The A’ Buang-buang Tradition in Lembanna Village: The Perspective of Islamic

Authors

  • Iin Nurul Fatiha Institut Agama Islam STIBA Makassar, Indonesia
  • Kurnaemi Anita Institut Agama Islam STIBA Makassar, Indonesia
  • Maryam Maryam Institut Agama Islam STIBA Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36701/fikrah.v3i5.3231

Keywords:

a’ buang-buang, fiqh muamalah, ‘urf, local tradition, islamic law

Abstract

This article examines the tradition of a’ buang-buang practiced by the community of Lembanna Village, Bulukumba Regency, South Sulawesi, as a local social practice that involves giving money or goods during weddings, kalomba rituals, and other communal ceremonies. The study aims to describe the form and mechanism of the tradition, identify its fiqh characterization (takyīf fiqhī), and analyze its legal status from the perspective of Islamic commercial jurisprudence. This research employs a qualitative field approach through interviews, documentation, and normative fiqh analysis using the concepts of hibah, hadiyyah, ‘urf, qarḍ, tarāḍī, and the prohibition of conditional benefit in loans. The findings show that a’ buang-buang is not a single legal practice, but a graded social transaction whose ruling depends on intention, recording practices, repayment expectations, additional returns, and social pressure. When the contribution is given voluntarily without liability records or repayment demands, it may be classified as a permissible gift or valid social custom. However, when the contribution is recorded and socially understood as repayable, it tends to resemble social debt. If repayment with an additional amount becomes an implicit customary obligation or a source of shame and coercion, the practice becomes legally problematic. The study concludes that the tradition should not be abolished, but its contract must be clarified to preserve solidarity while preventing uncertainty, coercion, and unjust financial burden.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

‘Abdullāh, Ibn Juzayy al-Kalbī al-Garnāṭī Abū al-Qāsim Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn. al-Qawānīn al-Fiqhiyyah, t.p., t.t.p, t.th.

Ardiansyah, dkk., “Teknik Pengumpulan Data dan Instrumen Penelitian Ilmiah Pendidikan pada Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif,” Jurnal IHSAN : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam 1, no. 2 (2023): 4., doi:10.61104/ihsan.v1i2.57.

Arifuddin, Lisa, dkk., Analisis Makna Simbol Tradisi Kalomba Sebagai Komunikasi Pemersatu Masyarakat Kajang Luar Kabupaten Bulukumba, JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) 6, No. 10, (Oktober 2023) 8051. https://doi.org/10.54371/JIIP.V6I10.3029

Ayu, Hasriani, dkk., “Nilai-Nilai Islam dalam Tradisi Kalomba pada Masyarakat Kajang Desa Tambangan Kecamatan Kajang Kabupaten Bulukumba (Studi Unsur-Unsur Budaya Islam) Rihlah 10, no. 01 (2022).

Azizah, Noer, dkk., “Resiprositas Tradisi Membalas Amplop Pesta Pernikahan ‘ Tompangan ’ Terhadap Peningkatan Kohesi Sosial,” JURNAL AL-IJTIMAIYYAH 7, no. 1 (2021): 39, https://doi.org/10.22373/al-ijtimaiyyah.v7i1.9517.

Al-‘Asqalānī, Aḥmad ibn ‘Alī ibn Ḥajar. Fatḥ Al-Bārī Syarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Juz 4. Dār al-Rayyān li al-Turāṡ, 1407 H/1986 M.

A’yun, Siti Qurotul. dkk.,“Model-Model Penelitian Kualitatif: Literature Review”, Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia 4, no. 3 (2025): 353. https://jpion.org/index.php/jpi.

Al-Bābartī, Akmal al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn Maḥmūd. Al-‘Ināyah Syarḥ al-Hidāyah, Cet. I; Mesir: Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Aulādih, 1389 H/1970 M.

Al-Bābartī, Akmal al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn Maḥmūd. Al-‘Ināyah Syarḥ al-Hidāyah. Cet. I. Mesir: Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Aulādih, 1389 H/1970 M.

Beekun, Rafik I. “Balancing Ethical Responsibility Among Multiple Organizational Stakeholders: The Islamic Perspective”, Journal of Business Ethics 60, No. 2 (2005): 131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-8204-5.

Al-Bagdādī, Abū Ḥusain ibn Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad Ja’far al-Qudurī al-Ḥanafī, Mukhtaṣar al Qudurī. t.t.p.:Dār al-Kutub ‘Ilmiyah, t.th.

Bariroh, Muflihatul. “Hibah dan Utang Piutang dalam Potret Resiprositas Tradisi Becekan Masyarakat Muslim Pedesaan di Kabupaten Tulungagung” 7, no. 1 (2024): 1, https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.47971/mjhi.v7i1.909.

Al-Dimyāṭī, Abū ‘Ammār Yāsir ibn Aḥmad ibn Badr al-Najjār. Mawsū‘ah al-Fiqh ‘alā al-Mażāhib al-Arba‘ah. Cet. I. Kairo: Dār at-Taqwā, 1444 H/2023 M.

Gidion, Research Methodology Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis dan Karya Ilmiah (Cet. I; Yogyakarta: CV Mahata, 2019), h. 96.

Al-Hafīḍ, Ibnu Rusyḍ. Bidāyah al-Mujtahid wa Nihāyah al-Muqtaṡid. Jilid 3. Kairo: Dār al Hadīs, 1425 M/2004.

Al-Ḥambalī, Zaid al-Dīn al-Munajjah ibn ‘Uṡmān bin As’ad ibn al-Munaj al-Tanaukī. Al-Mumti’ fī Syarhu al-Muqni’. Jilid 2. Cet. III. Mekkah: Maktabah al-Asdī, 1422 H/2003 M.

Al-Ḥanafī, Abū Bakr ibn Mas‘ūd al-Kāsānī. Badā’iʿ al-Ṣanā’iʿ fī Tartīb al-Syarā’iʿ. Mesir: Maṭba‘ah al-Jamāliyyah, 1327–1328.

Al-Hanbalī, ‘Abdullah ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn Qudāmah al-Maqdisī al-Jamā’ilī al Dimasqī al-Ṣālihī. Al-Mugnī. Riyaḍ: al-Qāhira, 1412 H.

Al-Harawī, Abū Manṣūr Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn al-Azharī. Tahḍīb al-Lugah. Cet. I. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāṡ al-‘Arabī, 2001.

Al-Ḥijāwī. Abū al-Najā’ Syaraf al-Dīn Mūsā. Al-Iqnā‘ fī Fiqh al-Imām Aḥmad ibn Ḥanbal. Beirut: Dār al-Ma‘rifah, t.th., Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī ibn Ḥajar al-Haitamī. Tuhfah al-Muḥtāj fī Syarḥ al-Minhāj. Mesir: al-Maktabah al-Tijāriyyah al-Kubrā, 1357 H/1983 M.

Idhami, Dahlan. Karakteristik Hukum Islam. Surabaya: Al-Ikhlas, 1994.

Ista, Akram et al., “Consumer Behavior Assolo ’ pada Acara Pernikahan Suku Kajang dalam Perspektif Maslahah”, Business and Investment Review (BIREV) 2, no. 2 (2024). doi: 10.61292/birev.102.

Al-Jazīr, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Muḥammad ‘Awaḍ. Al-Fiqh ʿalā al-Maḍāhib al-Arbaʿah. Jilid 5. Cet. II; Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1424 H/2003 M.

Lintang, Fitri. Fatma Ulfatun Najicha, "Nilai-Nilai Sila Persatuan Indonesia dalam Keberagaman Kebudayaan Indonesia", Jurnal Global Citizen 11 no. 1 (2022): h. 80., doi:10.33061/jgz.v11i1.7469

Al-Kharasyī, Abū ‘Abdullāh Muḥammad. Syarḥ al-Kharasyī ‘alā Mukhtaṣar Khalīl. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr lī al-Ṭibā‘a, 1317.

Al-Lāḥim, Abd al-Karīm ibn Muḥammad. Al-Muṭṭaliʿ ʿalā Daqāʾiq Zād al-Mustaqniʿ: al-Muʿāmalāt al-Māliyyah. Cet. I. Riyaḍ: Dār Kunūz Ishbīliyā li al-Nashr wa al-Tawzīʿ, 1429 H/2008 M.

Al-Majīd, Abd. Al-Qawāʿid al-Fiqhiyyah al-Mustakhrijah Min Iʿlām al-Muwaqqiʿīn. Cet. I. t.t.: Dār ibn al-Qayyim, 1421.

Al-Mālikī, Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Ṣāwī. Hāsyiyah al-Ṣāwī alā al-Syarḥ al-Ṣagīr. Jilid 2. Kairo: Maktabah Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī, 1372 H/1952 M.

Al-Mālikī, Al-Qāḍī Muḥammad ibn ‘Abdullāh Abū Bakr ibn al-‘Arabī al-Ma‘āfirī al-Isybīlī. Aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Jilid 1. Cet. III. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1424 H/2003 M.

Maloko, M. Thahir dan Ananda Nurifqi Heri, “Tinjauan Hukum Islam Terhadap Tradisi Massolo’ pada Acara Walimah Al-Ursy di Kelurahan Jongaya, Kecamatan Tamalate, Kota Makassar,” Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 5 (2023): 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtishaduna.vi.35948

Al-Maududi, Abu A‘la. Al-Ribā. Beirut: Muassasah ar-Risalah, 1979 M.

Al-Māwardī, Abū al-Hasan ‘Ali ibn Muḥammad ibn Habīb. Al-Hāwil Kubra fī Fiqh Mazhab al-Imām Syāfi‘ī. Jilid 5. Cet. I. Bairut: Dār al-Kutub ‘Ilmiyah, 1999.

Al-Mushayqih, Khalid bin ‘Ali bin Muhammad. Al-Jāmi‘ Li-Aḥkām Al-Waqf Wa Al-Hibāt Wa Al-Waṣāyā. Qatar: Wizārat al-Awqāf wa al-Shu’ūn al-Islāmīah, 1343.

Muslimin, Ainun Syafitri. “Tradisi Adat Kalomba: Kajian Makna dan Nilai Budaya pada Masyarakat Desa Bonto Biraeng Kabupaten Bulukumba”, Titian: Jurnal Ilmu Humaniora 5, no. 1 (2021). doi: https://doi.org/10.22437/titian.v5i2.15371.

Al-Muṭairī, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Ḥamūd. Fiqh Al-Mu‘āmalāt Al-Māliyyah Al-Muyassar. Cet. II. Kuwait: Maṭba‘at al-Naẓā’ir, 1437.

Al-Muṭiri, Abd al-Raḥmān bin Humūd. Muāmalāh al-Māliyah al-Muyassar. Kuwait: Muāmalāh al-Māliyah al-Muyassar, 2016.

Amiruddin, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cet. IX. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, 2016.

Al-Naisābūrī, Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj al-Qusyairī. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Kairo: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah, t. th.

Al-Najdī, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān bin Muḥammad ibn Qāsim al-‘Āṣimī al-Ḥanbalī. Hāsyiyah al-Rauḍ al-Murabbaʿ ‘alā Syarḥ Zād al-Muṡaqniʿ. Jilid 6. Cet. I. t.p. t.t.p. 1397 H.

Al-Najdī, ʿUṡmān ibn Aḥmad ibn Saʿīd. Ḥāsyiyat al-Muntahā al-Irādāh fī Jamʿ al-Muqniʿ maʿa al-Tanqīḥ wa al-Ziyādāt. Cet. I. Bairut: Muʾassasah al-Risālah, 1419 H/1999 M.

Al-Najdī, ʿUṡmān ibn Aḥmad ibn Saʿīd. Muntahā al-Irādāt fī Jamʿ al-Muqniʿ Maʿa al-Tanqīḥ wa al-Ziyādāt. Cet. I. t.p. t.t. 1397.

Al-Nawawī, Abū Zakariyyā Muḥyī al-Dīn Yaḥyā ibn Syaraf. Syarḥ Al-Nawawī ‘alā Muslim. Juz 11. Dār al-Khair, 1416.

Al-Nawawī, Abū Zakariyyāh Muḥyī al-Dīn ibn Syaraf. Al-Majmūʿ Syarḥ al-Muhaẓẓab. Kairo: Idārat al-Ṭibā‘ah al-Munīriyyah, 1344-1347 H.

Al-Nawawī, Abū Zakariyyāh Muḥyī al-Dīn Yaḥyā ibn Sharaf. Rauḍah al-Ṭālibīn wa ‘Umdat al-Muftīn, Cet. III; Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1412 H /1991 M. Syams al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Abī al-ʿAbbās Aḥmad ibn Ḥamzah Syihāb al-Dīn al-Ramlī, Nihāyah al-Muḥtāj ilā Syarḥ Al-Minhāj. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1404 H /1984 M.

Nujaym, Zain al-Dīn ibn Ibrāhīm ibn Muḥammad Ibn. Al-Asybāh Wa Al-Naẓā’ir ‘alā Mażhab Abī Ḥanīfah Al-Nu‘Mān. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1419.

Nurjaya, Nyoman. “Is the Constitutional and Legal Recognition of Traditional Community Laws Within the Multicultural Country of Indonesia A Genuine Or Pseudo Recognition ?”, Constitutional Review 1, no. 2 (2015): 50. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev123.

Al-Qurṭūbī, Abū Abdullah Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad ibn al-Anṣārī. Al-Jāmi‘ lī Aḥkām Al-Qur’an. Kairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Maṣriyah, 1964.

Al-Qurṭubī, Muhammad bin Ahmad. Al-Jāmi‘ li Aḥkām Al-Qur’ān, Juz 5. Cet. II. Kairo: Dār al-Kutub al Miṣriyyah, 1964.

Rahmadhani, Novi dkk., “The Transformation of Deleh Mendeleh: An ‘Urf-Based Analysis of Reciprocity in Sukowati Village,” Bustanul Fuqaha: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2026): 202–14, https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v7i1.2964.

Al-Ramlī, Syams al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Abī al-ʿAbbās Aḥmad ibn Ḥamzah Syihāb al-Dīn. Nihāyah al-Muḥtāj ilā Syarḥ a l-Minhāj. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1404 H/1984 M.

Rauf, Abd. “Kedudukan Hukum Adat dalam Hukum Islam”, Jurnal Tahkim 9, no. 1 (2013): 20-34.

Rice, Gillian. “Islamic Ethics and the Implications for Business”, Journal of Business Ethics 18 , No. 4 (1999): 345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005711414306.

Rizal, Fitra. “PENERAPAN ‘ URF SEBAGAI METODE DAN SUMBER HUKUM,” Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 1, no. 2 (2019): 172.

Rizhan, Afrinald. “Kedudukan Al-‘Adah Dan Al-‘Urf Sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam,” Jurnal Gagasan Hukum 6, no. 1 (2024): 81. doi:https://doi.org/10.31849/jgh.v6i01.19526

Sinnah, Ahmad Fahmi Abū. Al-ʿUrf wa al-ʿĀdah fī Raʾyi al-Fuqahāʾ. Mesir: Maṭbaʿah al-Azhār, 1947.

Setiyawan, Agung. “Budaya Lokal Dalam Perspektif Agama:,” ESENSIA 13, no. 2 (2012). doi:10.14421/esensia.v13i2.738.

Sunuwati, dkk., “Buginese Tradition ‘Massolo’ in Soreang District, Parepare (Study of Islamic Law)” Marital: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 1, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.35905/marital_hki.v1i1.3239.

Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn ‘Abd al-Raḥmān, Al-Asybāh Wa Al-Naẓāʾir Fī Qawāʿid Wa Furūʿ Fiqh Al-Syāfiʿiyyah. Cet I; t.tt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1403.

Syalabī, Muḥammad Muṣṭafā. Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Beirut: Dār al-Nahḍah, 1986.

Al-Syafi‘i, Abu Bakar Utsman ibn Muhammad Syaththa ad-Dimyathi. I‘ānat Al-Ṭālibīn ‘alā Ḥalli Alfāẓ Fatḥ Al-Mu‘Īn. Dar al-Fikr li al-Ṭibā‘ah wa al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzī‘, 1518.

Al-Syarbīnī, Al-Khaṭīb. Mugnī al-Muhtāj, Jilid. 2. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr., Ibn al-Humām al-Ḥanafī, Syarḥ Fatḥ al-Qadīr ‘alā al-Hidāyah. Jilid 7. Mesir: Syarikah Maktabah wa Maṭba‘ah Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Aulāduh, 1389.

Syarvina, Wahyu, dkk., “Aplikasi ‘ Urf dalam Ekonomi Islam ,” AT-TIJARAH: Jurnal Penelitian Keuangan Dan Perbankan Syariah 4, no. 1 (2022): h. 1, doi: https://doi.org/10.52490/attijarah.v4i1.285.

Al-Syāwī, Muḥammad ibn Ṣāliḥ. Al-Tuḥfah Al-Makkiyyah Fī Tauḍīḥ Ahamm Al-Qawā‘id Al-Fiqhiyyah. t.t. Awqāf al-Syaikh Muḥammad ibn Ṣāliḥ al-Syāwī, 1443 H/ 2022M.

Syubair, Muḥammad ’Uṡman. Al-Madkhal ilā Fiqh al-Muʿāmalāh al-Māliyyah. Cet. II. Yordania: Dār al-Nafāʾis, 2010.

Al-Ṭabar, Abū Ja‘far Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. Jāmi‘al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl Āy al-Qur’ān. Mekkah: Dār al-Tarbiyyah wa al-Turāṡ. t.th.

Taimiyyah, Syaikh al-Islām Aḥmad ibn. Majmū‘ Al-Fatāwā. Madinah: Majma‘ al-Malik Fahd li Ṭibā‘ah al-Muṣḥaf al-Syarīf, 1425.

Tajuddin, Fatjri Nur, Afidatul Asmar, “The Socio-Economic Transformation in Makassar Tribe Gift-Giving Tradition: Reconstructing Social Welfare Strategy,” Osmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, , no. 2 (2024): 19, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v16.i2.8847.

Al-Tauyajirī, Ḥamūd ibn ‘Abdullāh ibn Ḥamūd ibn ‘Abd al-Raḥmān. Al-Ṣārim al-Battār li al-Ijhāz ‘alā man Khālafa al-Kitāb wa al-Sunnah wa al-Ijmā‘ wa al-Ātsār. Cet. I. Riyadh: al-Ri’āsah al-‘Āmmah lī Idārāt al-Buḥūts al-'Ilmiyyah wa al-Iftā wa Da'wah wa al-rasyād, 1409.

Al-Ṭayyār, Abdullāh ibn Muḥammad. Al-Fiqh al-Muyassar. Riyaḍ-Arab Saudi: Madār al-Waṭan, 1432 H/2011 M.

Trautmann, Thomas R .“The Gift in India,” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7, no. 2 (2017): 485–96, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.2.041.

Al-Tūnisī, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir ibn Muḥammad bin Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir bin ‘Āsyūr. Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘ah Al-Islāmiyyah. Qatar: Kementerian Wakaf dan Urusan Islam, 1425.

Turyani, Iin, dkk., “Norma dan Nilai Adat Istiadat dalam Kehidupan Sehari-Hari”, Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS 2, no. 2 (2024): 234. doi: https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v2i2.224.

Tongco, Ma. Dolores C. “Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection,” Ethnobotany Research & Applications 5 (2007).

Al-‘Uṡaimīn, Muḥammad ibn Ṣāliḥ. al-Syarḥ al-Mumti’ ‘Alā Zādī al-Mustaqnī. Dammam: Dār ibn al-Jauzī, 2004.

Utama, Tody Sasmitha Jiwa. “Between Adat Law and Living Law: An Illusion of Customary Law Incorporation into Indonesia Penal System”, The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 53, no. 2 (2021): 269. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.1945222.

Perkasa, Adrian, dkk., “The Kampung, the City and the Nation: Bhinneka Tunggal Ika in the Everyday Urban Life of Kampung Peneleh, Surabaya, Indonesia”, Asia Pacific Viewpoint 63, no. 3 (2022): 364-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12359.

Purwoyuliyanto, Heru dan Kasori Mujahid, “Islam and Local Wisdom: A Literature Review on the Relationship Between Culture and Religion in Indonesia”, NIZAM: International Journal of Islamic Studies 3, No. 1 (2025): 8. https://journal.csspublishing.com/index.php/nizam.

Putra, Heddy Shri Ahimsa. “Fenomenologi Agama: Pendekatan Fenomenologi Untuk Memahami Agama,” Walisongo 20, no. 2 (2012): 301, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.20.2.200.

Yan, Yunxiang. “Gifts,” The Open Encyclopedia of Anthropology, no. 2020 (2023): 1.

Yuliatin, dkk., “Reciprocity and Debt in Marriage Traditions in Jambi: An Inheritance Calculation Analysis from The Perspective of Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘Ah,” Al-Istinbath Jurnal Hukum Islam 10, no. 1 (2025): 154–71, https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i1.11127.

Yuliyani, Allya Putri. “Peran Hukum Adat dan Perlindungan Hukum Adat di Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains 2, no. 9 (2023): 863. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i09.648.

Al-Zuḥailī, Wahbah ibn Muṣṭafā. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī wa Adillatuh. Juz 4. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, Suriah, t.th.

Zaidān, ‘Abd al-Karīm. al-Wajīz fī Syarḥ al-Qawāʿid al-Fiqhiyyah fī al-Syarīʿah al-Islāmiyyah. Cet. I. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 1422 H/2001 M.

Zakarīyā, Abū al-Ḥusain Aḥmad ibn Fāris ibn. Muʿjam Maqāyīs al-Lugah. Mesir: Syirkah Maktabah wa Maṭbaʿah Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī wa Aulādih, t.th.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Tradisi A’ Buang-buang di Desa Lembanna Perspektif Fikih Muamalah: The A’ Buang-buang Tradition in Lembanna Village: The Perspective of Islamic. (2026). AL-FIKRAH: Jurnal Kajian Islam, 3(5), 976-1003. https://doi.org/10.36701/fikrah.v3i5.3231