Pengobatan dengan Benda Haram Perspektif Ulama Mazhab

Treatment with Haram Object from the Perspective of the Mazhab Scholars

  • Muhammad Nirwan Idris Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar, Indonesia
  • Kurnaemi Anita Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Anugrah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar, Indonesia
Keywords: haram object, treatment, comparative

Abstract

This research aims to find out and understand the legal concept of using haram objects in treatment from the perspective of sectarian scholars. This research is a descriptive qualitative research based on literature (Library research) which is based on relevant texts as an analytical tool, using normative and comparative approach methods. The research results first discuss the emergency limitations of the fuqaha perspective. Furthermore, the results of the study found that: 1) Ulama agrees on the prohibition of seeking treatment with haram objects under normal circumstances without any element of emergency. It's just that they have different opinions in emergencies, some of which absolutely prohibit it, consisting of the majority of Hanafiyah, Malikiyah, Syafi'iyah and Hanabilah scholars. Some Hanafiyah scholars allow it with conditions; 2) The opinion chosen in this matter is permissible with conditions, namely that there is an element of emergency and a recommendation from a trusted Muslim doctor, where it is confirmed that the drug can treat the disease and there is no halal drug that can replace it.

References

Abdu al-Azīz bin Aḥmad Alāuddīn al-Bukhārī al-Hanafī. Kasyf Al-Asrār Syarh Uṣul al-Bazdawī. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1997.
Abu Dāwud Sulaiman bin al-Asy’ats al-Sijistānī. Sunan Abī Dāwud. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 2009.
Ahmad al-Dardīr. Al-Syarh al-Ṣagīr ‘Ala Aqrab al-Masalik. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-Arabī, 1998.
Al-Albani, Muhammad Nashiruddin bin Nuh. Silsilah Ahādīs Al-Shahihah. Cet. 1. Riyad: Makhtabah al-Ma’ārif, 2001.
Al-Albāni, Muhammad Nāṣiruddīn. Ṣahīh Wa Ḍa’īf Sunan al-Tirmizī. Jilid 5. Cet.1. Maktabah Syamilah versi 3.61, n.d.
Al-Bukhāri, Muhammad bin Ismāīl. Sahīh Bukhāri. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār Ṭūqunnajāh, 2000.
Al-Fairūzābādā, Abu Ṭāhir Muḥammad bin Ya’kūb. Al-Qāmūs al-Muḥīṭ. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār Iḥya’ al-Turāṡ al-‘Arabī, 1992.
Al-Gāzī, Muḥammad Ṣidqī bin Aḥmad. Al-Wajiz Fi Iḍāhi Qawā’idu al-Fiqh al-Kulliyah. Cet. 1. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risālah al-‘Ālamiyah, 1996.
Al-‘Imrānī, Abū Husain Yahyā bin Abi al-Khair. Al-Bayān Fī al-Imām al-Syāfi’ī. Cet. 1. Jeddah: Dār al-Minhāj, 2000.
Al-Jaṣāṣ, Ahmad bin ‘Alī Abū Bakr al-Razī. Ahkām Al-Qur’an. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1994.
Al-Mauṣulī, Abdullah bin Mahmūd bin Maudūd al-Mauṣulī. Al-Ikhtiyār Lita’līl al-Mukhtār. Cet. 1. Beirut: Maṭba’ah al-Halabī, 1937.
Al-Nawawi, Abu Zakariyah Yahya. Al-Majmu’ Syarh al-Muhazab. Juz 9. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri, 2005.
Al-Qārḍawi, Yusuf. Al-Halāl Wa al-Harām Fi al-Islām. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 2012.
Al-Rāzī, Abu Bakar bin Abi Hātim. Ādābu Al-Syāfi,ī Wa Manāqibuhu. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2009.
Al-Ribāṭ, Khālid. Al-Jāmi’ Li’ulūm al-Imām Ahmad. Cet. 1. Mesir: Dār al-Fallāh, 2009.
Al-Sagnāqī, Husain bin ‘Alī. Al-Nihāyah Fī Syarh al-Hidāyah, n.d.
Al-Ṣa’īdī, Abu Hasan ‘Alī bin Ahmad. Ḥasyiyyah Al-‘Adawī ‘ala Syarh Kifāyah al-Ṭālib al-Rabbānī. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri, 1994.
Al-Salmānī, Abū Muhammad Abdul ‘Azīz. Al-As-Ilah Wa al-Wibah al-Fiqhiyah, n.d.
Al-Syarbīnī, Muhammad bin Ahmad al-Khaṭib. Mugnī Al-Muhtāj. Juz 4. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-Arabī, 2000.
Burhanuddīn, Abu al-Ma’ālī. Al-Muhīṭ al-Burhānī. Juz 5. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 2004.
Haqqi, Abdul, Ahmad Tamimi, and Ahmad Daman Huri. “Hadis Berobat Dengan Benda Haram Dalam Sunan Abu Dawud Metode Mukhtalif Al-Ḥadis Syaikh Shalih Al-’Utsaimin.” Jurrafi 2, no. 2 (2022): 1–12.
Ibnu Abdissalām al-Damasyqī, Abu Muhammad Izzuddīn. Qawa’id al-Ahkam Fī Maṣālihil Anām. Cet. 1. Kairo: Maktabah al-Kulliyāt al-Azhāriyyah, 1991.
Ibnu ‘Abidin, Muhammad Amīn bin Abdu al-Azīz al-Hanafi. Raddul Muhtār ‘ala al-Durril Mukhtār. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri, 2005.
Ibnu al-Qayyim al-Jauziyah. Al-Tibb al-Nabawī. Cet. 1. Kairo: Darul Hilal, 1998.
Ibnu Ḥajar al-Haitamī, Aḥmad bin Muḥammad bin ‘Ali. Tuḥfah Al-Muḥtāj Fī Syarḥ al-Minhāj. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār Ihyā’ al-Turāṡ al-Arabī, 1983.
Ibnu Manzūr, Muhammad bin Mukrim bin ‘Alī. Lisān Al-‘Arab. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār Ṣādir, 1992.
Ibnu Qudāmah, Abu Abdillah bin Ahmad bin Muhammad. Al-Mughni. Juz 8. Cet. 1. Mesir: Dār al-Manar, 1987.
Ibnu Rusyd, Abū al-Walīd Muhammad bin Ahmad. Bidayah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihayah al-Muqtasid. Cet. 1. Kairo: Dār al-Hadīs, 1998.
Ibnu Taimiyah, Taqiyuddīn abu al-Abbās Ahmad al-Harānī. Majmu’ al-Fatāwā. Cet. 1. Madinah: Dār Wafā, 2010.
Kementerian Agama RI. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya. Cet. 1. Surabaya: Halim, 2013.
Majmū’ah min al-Muallifīn. Al-Mausū’ah al-Fiqhiyyah al-Kuaitiyyah. Cet. 1. Kuwait: Wizārah al-Auqāf, 2005.
———. Majallah Al-Bayān, n.d.
Muhammad bin Abdirrahman al-Maghribī, Syamsuddīn Abu Abdillah. Mawahibu Al-Jalīl. Juz 1. Cet. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Fikri, 1993.
Muhammad bin Ahmad Ibnu Jazā. Al-Qawānīn al-Fiqhiyyah. Cet. 1. Kairo: Darul Islam, 1995.
Muslim bin al-Hajjāj al-Naisabūrī. Sāhīh Muslim. Cet 1. Beirut: Dār Ṭūqunnajāh, 2000.
Nufiar, and Muhammad Akbar. “Penjualan Hewan Yang Haram Dikonsumsi Untuk Bahan Baku Obat-Obatan.” JHEI 1, no. 1 (2022): 1–13.
Nurdin, Zurifah, and Suryani. “Benda Najis Sebagai Sarana Terapi Dalam Persepektif Islam.” In International Seminar on Islamic Studies, 175–84. Bengkulu: IAIN BENGKULU, 2019.
Yenti, Endri. “Berobat Dengan Benda Haram Dalam Perspektif Islam.” Al Irsyad 1, no. 2 (2018): 137–46.
Yusoff, Harmy Mohd Yusoff, et al. Fikah Perubatan. 1st ed. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Zafar Sdn. Bhd, 2011.
Zakariyah al-Anṣāri. Asnā Almuṭalib. Cet. 1. Jeddah: Dār al-Kitab al-Islamī, 1997.
Published
2024-01-22
Statistic
Viewed: 21
Downloaded: 19
How to Cite
Muhammad Nirwan Idris, Kurnaemi Anita, and Muhammad Anugrah. 2024. “Pengobatan Dengan Benda Haram Perspektif Ulama Mazhab”. AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Bahasa Arab 3 (1), 63-83. https://doi.org/10.36701/qiblah.v3i1.1328.