Qiyās in Islamic Law: A Comparative Study of the Shāfiʿī school and and the Ẓāhirī School in Contemporary Legal Reasoning
Qiyās dalam Hukum Islam: Studi Komparatif Mazhab Syāfiʿī dan Mazhab Ẓāhirī dalam Penalaran Hukum Kontemporer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36701/qiblah.v5i4.3521Keywords:
Qiyās, Islamic Jurisprudence, Comparison, al-Shafi'i, al-ZahiriAbstract
This article examines Qiyās as a controversial style of Islamic legal reasoning through a thorough comparison of the ideas of the Shāfiʿī school and the Ẓāhirīs and its consequences for contemporary jurisprudence. It is based on the major usūl al‑fiqh sources and modern legal theory. It argues that the Shāfiʿī school’s conception of Qiyās is a systematic extension of textual rulings, based on a carefully defined ʿillah and a hierarchically ordered set of evidences, providing a systematic but flexible framework in dealing with new cases. Conversely, the categorical rejection of Qiyās by the Ẓāhirī school demonstrates a purposeful commitment to textual literalism, valuing certainty of scripture meaning over analogical extension, and considerably confining the scope of legal innovation. The primary findings are that these different views towards Qiyās lead to different models of legal rationality. The Shāfiʿī school's model includes reason within the limits of revelation, whereas the Ẓāhirī model restricts reasoning to the express phrasing of the texts. The contribution of this study to scholarship is twofold: it clarifies the conceptual trade-offs between doctrinal fidelity and normative adaptability; and it offers a theoretically informed bridge between classical usūl al-fiqh and the contemporary conversation on legal analogy, norm extension, and the responsiveness of Islamic law to the challenges of new issues.
Downloads
References
Al-Amidi, Abu al-Ḥasan Ali ibn Abi Ali ibn Muhammad. Al-Ihkam Fi Ushul Ahkam. Edited by Abd al-Razzaq ’Afifi. 1st ed. Al-Riyadh: Daar al-Shami’i, 2003. https://dn760002.eu.archive.org/0/items/WAQ26547/eoaa3.pdf.
Al-Sa’di, Abd al-Hakim Abd al-Rahman As’ad. Mabahith Al-’Illah Fi Al-Qiyas ’inda Al-Ushuliyyin. 2nd ed. Beirut: Daar al-Basya’ir al-Islamiyyah, 2000.
Al-Shāfiʿī, Muḥammad ibn Idrīs. Al-Risālah Fī Uṣūl Al-Fiqh. 1st ed. Jeddah: Daar al-Minhaj, 2014. https://dn721907.ca.archive.org/0/items/FP143795C/143795C.pdf.
Anshori, Ahmad Yani, and Landy Trisna Abdurrahman. “History of the Development of Mażhab, Fiqh and Uṣūl Al-Fiqh: Reasoning Methodology in Islamic Law.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 1 (2025): 273–98. doi:10.22373/sjhk.v9i1.25355.
———. “History of the Development of Mażhab, Fiqh and Uṣūl Al-Fiqh: Reasoning Methodology in Islamic Law.” Samarah 9, no. 1 (2025): 273–98. doi:10.22373/sjhk.v9i1.25355.
Fadel, Mohammad, and Ahmad Hasan. “Analogical Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Study of the Juridicial Principle of Qiyas.” Journal of Law and Religion 15, no. 1/2 (2000): 359. doi:10.2307/1051524.
Farahat, Omar. “Reason-Giving and the Duty to Obey: Perspectives from Classical Islamic Jurisprudence.” Journal of Law and Religion 36Farahat, no. 1 (2021): 5–28. doi:DOI: 10.1017/jlr.2020.52.
Farooq, Mohammad Omar. “Analogical Reasoning (Qiyas) and the Commodification of Women: Applying Commercial Concepts to the Marital Relationship in Islamic Law.” ICR Journal 3, no. 1 (2011): 154–80. doi:10.52282/icr.v3i1.585.
Gleave, Robert M. “Conceptions of the Literal Sense (Ẓāhir, Ḥaqīqa) in Muslim Interpretive Thought.” In Interpreting Scriptures in Judaism, Christianity and Islam: Overlapping Inquiries, 183–203, 2016. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107588554.009.
Halim, Abdul, and Muhlizar Muhlizar. “Relevance of Qiyas in Contemporary Legal Determination : Analysis of the Perspective of Usul Fiqh.” Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature 4, no. 001 (2024): 649–54. doi:10.54012/jcell.v4i001.457.
Hasan Assidiqi, Ali, Dini Sadiyah, and Mujtahid. “Pemikiran Qiyas Dan Implementasinya Di Era Modern.” Moderasi : Journal of Islamic Studies 3, no. 2 (2023): 131–44. doi:10.54471/moderasi.v3i2.45.
Ikromi, Zul, and Hellen Lastfitriani. “The Conceptual Evolution of Maqāṣid Al-Syarī’ah: A Historical Study of the Transformation of Major Principles in Islamic Thought” 6, no. 2 (2026).
Kepplinger, Eva. “Rethinking Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿa: Promises, Limits and Practice in Aḥmad Al-Raysūnī’s Thought.” Religions 17, no. 5 (2026). doi:10.3390/rel17050618.
Komath, Muhammed. “Rational Force of Analogy / Qiyās in Law : Logic of Law in Islamic and Contemporary Legal Reasoning Muhammed Komath.” Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation Theory and Practice 45, no. 3 (2025): 423–48.
Laksana, Andri Winjaya, Muhammad Ridwan Lubis, Denny Suwondo, Muhammad Ngazis, and Ratih Mega Puspa Sari. “Integrating Maqasid Al-Shari’ah in Contemporary Islamic Legal Reform on Drug Policy.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (2025): 416–39. doi:10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10665.
Martínez-Cazalla, M. Dolors, Tania Menéndez-Martín, and Shahid Rahman. “Parallel Reasoning by Ratio Legis in Contemporary Jurisprudence. Elements for a Dialogical Approach.” Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning 22 (2021): 163–87. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61438-6_9.
Mensia, Mokdad Arfa. “Dogmatics, Theology, and Philosophy in Averroes.” In Interpreting Averroes: Critical Essays, 27–44, 2018. doi:10.1017/9781316335543.003.
Miftah, A A. “Refusal on Qiyas and Implications for Development Contemporary Islamic Law (Study on the Ibn Hazm Critics to Qiyas).” International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies 8, no. 4 (2014): 1545–53.
Monawer, Abu Talib Mohammad, Noor Naemah Abdul Rahman, Ameen Ahmad Qasem Al-Nahari, Luqman Haji Abdullah, Abdul Karim Ali, and Achour Meguellati. “The Actualization of Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿah in Islamic Finance: A Conceptual Framework.” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 15, no. 5 (2022): 847–64. doi:10.1108/IMEFM-06-2020-0293.
Mubarrak, Zahrul, Imran Abu Bakar, Muslem Hamdani, Musrizal Musrizal, and Khalilullah Khalilullah. “The Urgency of the Islamic Law and Contemporary Societal Challenges: The Flexibility of Al-Maslahah in Determining the Hierarchy of Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿah.” El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga 8, no. 1 (2025): 344–65. doi:10.22373/pxydd884.
Muzakki, M. Harir, Masykur Rozi, and Ali Akhbar Abaib Mas Rabbani Lubis. “AL-JUWAINI’S IDEAS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF ISLAMIC LAW: A Shifting Paradigm from the Inadequacy of Qiyas as a Method of Ijtihad to Mashlahah.” Ulumuna 29, no. 2 (2025): 822–50. doi:10.20414/ujis.v29i2.1185.
Okuyucu, Nail. “Al-Shāfi‘ī’s Theory of Intra-Source Abrogation and Its Interpretations in Shāfi‘ī School of Thought.” Islam Arastirmalari Dergisi 2020, no. 43 (2020): 1–44. doi:10.26570/isad.650133.
Ouedraogo, Abdoul-hamid, Wan Mohd Yusof Wan Chik, and Ahmad Iqbal Mohd Fadzli. “The Similarity Between Ijtihād, Qiyās, And Taʿlīl: A Foundational Study in Light of The Objectives of Sharīʿah.” JFatwa: Journal of Fatwa Management and Research 31, no. 1 (2026): 261–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol31no1.755.
Rahman, Shahid, Farid Zidani, and Walter Edward Young. “Ibn Ḥazm on Heteronomous Imperatives. A Landmark in the History of the Logical Analysis of Norms.” Synthese Library 454, no. June (2022): 139–71. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-90749-5_8.
Sánchez, Omar García, Karim Rodríguez Pérez, Mohammed Ibrahim, and El Idrissi. “The Ẓāhirī School between East and West: Tracing the Development of Islamic Legal Literalism from Baghdad to Cordoba Abstract :” Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law 08, no. 1 (2025): 51–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.35719/xh45z858.
Sanuri, Sanuri. “The Strategic Role of Qiyas Theory on Elasticity of Islamic Law in Solving Contemporary Issues.” Al-Qanun, 2024. doi:10.15642/alqanun.2023.26.2.137-148.
Serrano, Delfina. “Paternity and Filiation Acording to the Jurists of Al-Andalus: Legal Doctrines on Transgresion of the Islamic Social Order.” Imago Temporis - Medium Aevum 7 (2013): 59–75. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84930340303&partnerID=40&md5=4b30911ae37adb356f7d4e829c7d37c6.
Shaarani, Ahmad Zakirullah Mohamed, Fidlizan Muhammad, Mohd Yahya Mohd Hussin, and Mohd Asyraf Sharunudin. “The Analysis of Qiyas on Numbers/Muqaddarāt and Its Application in Contemporary Muamalat.” Journal of Fatwa Management and Research 31, no. 2 (2026): 534–67. doi:10.33102/jfatwa.vol31no2.715.
Shehaby, Nabil. “‘Illa and Qiyas in Early Islamic Legal Theory.” In Islamic Legal Theory: Volume 1, 1:307–26, 2017. doi:10.4324/9781315251721-24.
Sumiyati, Sumiyati, Yanto Yanto, Julia Julia, Rozi Rozi, and Abu Nizarudin. “Ontological and Epistemological Disequilibrium: Harmonization of Islamic Financial Accounting Standards and the Economic Political Interests in Indonesia to Maqasid’ul-Shari’ah.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, no. November 21 (2025): 1–16. doi:10.1108/JIABR-12-2024-0545.
Syah, Muhammad Baharudin, and Muhajirin Muhajirin. “Legality of Qiyas in Legal Terms: The Implementation in Islamic Economics and Finance.” Al-Amwal : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syari’ah 15, no. 2 (2023): 273–86. doi:10.24235/amwal.v15i2.14364.
Vishanoff, David R. “A Reader’s Guide to Al-Shāfiʿī’s Epistle on Legal Theory (Al-Risāla).” Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 28, no. 3 (2017): 245–69. doi:10.1080/09596410.2017.1289705.
Yıldız, Rifat. “Ta’wīl in Ibn Hazm’s Understanding of Usūl.” Cumhuriyet Ilahiyat Dergisi 24, no. 3 (2020): 1199–1217. doi:10.18505/cuid.786517.
Zakariyah, Luqman. “Al-Shāfi’ī’s Position on Analogical Reasoning in Islamic Criminal Law: Jurists Debates and Human Rights Implications.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 30, no. 2 (2017): 301–19. doi:10.1007/s11196-016-9495-4.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ismail Jalili
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
FOCUS AND SCOPE
EDITORIAL TEAM
