Kredibilitas Maṭar bin Ṭahmān al-Warrāq dalam Perspektif al-Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl: Analisis Kritis atas Penilaian Ulama Hadis

The Credibility of Maṭar bin Ṭahmān al-Warrāq in the Perspective of Jarḥ wa Taʿdīl: A Critical Analysis of Hadith Scholars’ Assessments

Authors

  • Abdullah Abdullah Institut Agama Islam STIBA Makassar
  • Arya Syahputra Institut Agama Islam STIBA Makassar
  • Laode Muh Izzatul Islam Institut Agama Islam STIBA Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36701/jawamiulkalim.v4i2.3755

Keywords:

Maṭar bin Ṭahmān, jarḥ wa taʿdīl, kredibilitas perawi, kritik hadis

Abstract

This study examines the status of Maṭar bin Ṭahmān al-Warrāq from the perspective of jarḥ wa al-taʿdīl, particularly the divergent evaluations of his ʿadālah and ḍabṭ and their implications for the acceptance of his narrations. The study aims to analyze the evaluations of hadith critics concerning Maṭar, identify the forms and contexts of jarḥ directed toward him, and determine his status as a narrator and its implications for the acceptance of his narrations. This research employs library research using a hadith studies approach, particularly the discipline of jarḥ wa al-taʿdīl. Data were collected from primary sources containing biographical information and scholarly evaluations of Maṭar and were analyzed comparatively by examining the wording of jarḥ and taʿdīl, the context of criticism, restrictions attached to particular transmission routes, and the relevant qarīnah. The findings indicate that the divergent evaluations of Maṭar primarily concern his ḍabṭ, particularly weaknesses and errors in his transmission from ʿAṭāʾ bin Abī Rabāḥ, rather than his ʿadālah. Based on a comparative assessment of the overall evaluations, Maṭar is positioned at the level of ṣadūq. His narrations do not reach the level of independent ḥujjah, yet they retain iʿtibār value and may be considered when supported by mutābaʿāt, syawāhid, or other qarīnah. This study contributes to a more proportionate assessment of Maṭar’s status by integrating jarḥ, taʿdīl, and the contextual dimensions of hadith transmission.

References

Al-‘Ijlī, Abū al-Ḥasan Aḥmad bin ‘Abdillāh bin Ṣāliḥ. Tārīkh Ats-Tsiqāt. Cet. 1. Dār al-Bāz, 1984.

Al-‘Ijlī, Abū al-Ḥasan Aḥmad bin ‘Abdullāh bin Ṣāliḥ. Ma‘rifah Al-Ṡiqāt Min Rijāl Ahl Al-‘Ilm Wa Al-Ḥadīṡ Wa Min Al-Ḍu‘Afā’ Wa Żikr Mażāhibihim Wa Akhbārihim. Cet. I. Madinah: Maktabah al-Dār, 1985.

Al-‘Umarī, Ḥanān bint Luwaifī ibn ‘Alī. “Aqwāl Maṭar Ibn Ṭahmān Al-Warrāq Fī Al-Tafsīr: Dirāsah Tafsīriyyah Taḥlīliyyah” 29, no. 51 (2021). https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1371124%0A%0A.

Al-‘Uqailī, Abū Ja‘far Muḥammad bin ‘Amr. Al-Ḍu‘Afā’ Al-Kabīr. Cet. I. Beirūt: Dār al-Maktabah al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1984.

Al-‘Uqailī, Muhammad bin ‘Amr. Al-Ḍu’afā’ Al-Kabīr. Cet. I. Bairūt: Dār Maktabah al-‘Ilmiah, 1984.

Al-Asqalānī, Ahmad bin ‘Ali. Fath Al-Bārī Bi Syarh Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Cet. I. Bairūt: Dār al-Ma’rifah, 1960.

Al-Asqalānī, Ahmad bin ‘Ali bin Hajar. Al-Maṭālib Al-‘Āliyah Bi-Zawā’Id Al-Masānīd Al-Ṡamāniyah. Cet. I. Dār al-‘Āṣimah li al-Nasyr wa al-Tawzī‘, n.d.

Al-Asqalānī, Ahmad bin ‘Ali bin Hajar. Lisān Al-Mīzān. Cet. II. Bairūt: Muassah al-A’lamī, 1971.

Al-Asqalānī, Ahmad bin ‘Ali bin Hajar. Tahżīb Al-Tahżīb. Cet. I. Bairūt: Muassah al-Risālah, 2014.

Al-Asqalānī, Ahmad bin ‘Ali bin Hajar. Taqrīb Al-Tahżīb. Cet. I. Damaskus: Dār al-Rasyid, 1406.

Al-Barr, Abū ‘Umar bin ‘Abd. Al-Tamhīd Limā Fī Al-Muwaṭṭa’ Min Al-Ma‘ānī Wa Al-Asānīd Fī Ḥadīṡ. Cet. I. Mu’assasah al-Furqān li at-Turāts al-Islāmī, 2017.

Al-Bukhari, Muhammad bin Ismail Abu ‘Abdillah. Al-Tārikh Al-Kabīr. Hyderabad: Dāirah al-Ma’arif al-Uṡmāniah, n.d.

Al-Busti, Abu Ḥatim Muhammad bin Ḥibbān. Al-Ṡiqāt. Cet. I. India: Dāirah al-Ma’ārif, 1973.

Al-Busti, Abu Ḥatim Muhammad bin Ḥibbān. Masyāhīr ‘Ulamā’ Al-Amṣār Wa A‘Lām Fuqahā’ Al-Aqṭār. Cet. I. Dār al-Wafā’ liṭ-Ṭibā‘ah wa an-Nasyr wa at-Tawzī‘, 1991.

Al-Dāraquṭnī, Abū al-Ḥasan ‘Alī bin ‘Umar bin Aḥmad. Al-Ilzāmāt Wa Al-Tatabbu‘. Cet. II. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1985.

Al-Farjānī, Qāsim Ramaḍān, Syāhīn ‘Abd al-Sayyid Būrūwāq, and Fatḥī Sa‘d al-Ṣāliḥīn Muḥammad. “Marwiyyāt Maṭar Al-Warrāq Fī Al-Sunnah (Musnad Al-Bazzār Anmūżajan).” Majallat Jāmi‘at Darnah Li Al-‘Ulūm Al-Insāniyyah Wa Al-Ijtimā‘Iyyah 3 (2025). https://dujhss.uod.edu.ly/index.php/dujhss/ar/article/view/105/102.

Al-Fāsī, Ibn al-Qaṭṭān. Bayān Al-Wahm Wa Al-Īhām Fī Kitāb Al-Aḥkām. Cet. I. Riyāḍ: Dār Ṭayyibah, 1997.

Al-Jurjānī, Abu Ahmad bin ‘Adi. Al-Kāmīl Fi Ḍu’afa Al-Rijal. Cet. I. Bairūt: al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiah, 1997.

Al-Maqdisi, and Abdul Ghani. Al-Kamāl Fī Asmā’ Al-Rijāl. Cet. 1. Kuwait: Syarikah Ghirās li ad-Di‘āyah wa al-I‘lān wa an-Nasyr wa at-Tawzī‘, 2016.

Al-Mizzi, Jamāl al-Dīn Yusuf. Tahżib Al-Kamāl Fī Asmā’Al-Rijāl. Cet. I. Bairūt: Muassah al-Risālah, 1992.

Al-Nasāī, Aḥmad bin Syu’aib. Al-Ḍu’afa Wa Al-Matrūkīn. Cet. I. Aleppo: Dār al-Wa’i, 1396.

Al-Nasāī, Aḥmad bin Syu’aib. Al-Sunan Al-Kubrā. Cet. I. Bairūt: Muassah al-Risālah, 2001.

Al-Rāzī, Abdurrahman bin Muhammad Ibnu Abi Ḥātim. Al-Jarḥ Wa Al-Ta’dīl. Cet. I. Bairūt: Dār Iḥyā al-Turāṡ al-’Arabi, 1952.

al-Sakhāwī, Syams al-Dīn Abū al-Khair Muḥammad bin ‘Abd al-Raḥmān. Fatḥ Al-Mugīṡ Bi-Syarḥ Alfiyyah Al-Ḥadīṡ Li Al-‘Irāqī. Cet. I. Mesir: Maktabah al-Sunnah, 2003.

Al-Sijistānī, Abu Dāud Sulaimān bin al-‘Asy’aṡ. Su’ālāt Abī ‘Ubaid Al-Ājurrī Abā Dāwūd as-Sijistānī Fī Al-Jarḥ Wa at-Ta‘Dīl. Cet. I. Madinah: Imādah al-Baḥts al-‘Ilmī bi al-Jāmi‘ah al-Islāmiyyah, 1983.

Al-Żahabī, Syamsuddin Muhammad bin Ahmad. Al-Kāsyif Fī Ma‘rifati Man Lahu Riwāyah Fī Al-Kutub as-Sittah. Cet. 1. Jeddah: Dār al-Qiblah li ats-Tsaqāfah al-Islāmiyyah, 1992.

Al-Żahabī, Syamsuddin Muhammad bin Ahmad. Al-Mugnī Fī Al-Ḍu’afā. Cet. I. Doha: Idārah Iḥyā al-Turāṡ, 2009.

Al-Żahabī, Syamsuddin Muhammad bin Ahmad. Mīzān Al-I‘tidāl Fī Naqd Ar-Rijāl. Cet. I. Beirūt: Dār al-Ma‘rifah liṭ-Ṭibā‘ah wa an-Nasyr, 1963.

Al-Żahabī, Syamsuddin Muhammad bin Ahmad. Siyar A’lām Al-Nubalā. Cet. I. Cairo: Dār al-Hadīṡ, 2006.

Al-Żahabī, Syamsuddin Muhammad bin Ahmad. Żikr Asmā’ Man Tukullima Fīhi Wa Huwa Muwaṡṡaq. Cet. I. Maktabah al-Manār, 1986.

Al-Zuhrī, Muhammad bin Sa’ad. Al-Ṭabaqāt Al-Kabīr. Cet. I. Cairo: Maktabah al-Kahnji, 2001.

Azlan, Umar bin. “KEPENTINGAN MENGANALISIS STATUS PERAWI HADIS DENGAN NERACA ILMU AL-JARH WA AL-TA’DIL: TUMPUAN TERHADAP STATUS PERIWAYATAN ABU HANIFAH.” Journal of Hadith Studies 9 (2024). https://journalofhadith.usim.edu.my/index.php/johs/article/view/292.

Darpen, Mohamad Hafiz (Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin). “Peranan Bahasa Dalam Menilai Perawi Hadis: Memahami Maksud Tersirat Perkataan Al-Jarḥ Wa Al-Taʿdīl.” Al-Qanatir 34 (2025). https://al-qanatir.com/aq/article/view/1335.

Muglaṭāya, Ala al-Dīn. Ikmāl Tahżīb Al-Kamāl Fī Asmā Al-Rijāl. Cet. I. al-Fāruq al-Hadīṡah, 2001.

Ṣalāḥ, Uṡmān bin Abdurrahman Ibnu. Ma’rifah Anwā’ ‘Ulūm Al-Hadīṡ. Cet. I. Bairūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1986.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Kredibilitas Maṭar bin Ṭahmān al-Warrāq dalam Perspektif al-Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl: Analisis Kritis atas Penilaian Ulama Hadis: The Credibility of Maṭar bin Ṭahmān al-Warrāq in the Perspective of Jarḥ wa Taʿdīl: A Critical Analysis of Hadith Scholars’ Assessments. (2026). JAWAMI’UL KALIM: Jurnal Kajian Hadis, 4(2), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.36701/jawamiulkalim.v4i2.3755