الجملة الإنشائية في اللغتين العربية والإندونيسية في ضوء التحليل التقابلي (الاستفهام مثالاً):

Rustam Koly

doi:10.36701/bashirah.v4i1.928

Rustam Koly Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA Makassar)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36701/bashirah.v4i1.928

Keywords: interrogative sentences, comparative analysis, structural sentences, Indonesian, Arabic.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the forms and functions of interrogative sentences in Arabic and Indonesian, discuss the similarities and differences between the two languages, and explain the methods used in both languages. This study also aims to contribute to overcoming language difficulties and errors that are often experienced by Indonesian students when learning Arabic, especially in the form of interrogative sentences. The method used in this study is a descriptive method of comparison between the two languages, which consists of three stages: (1) description of the language of inquiry in both languages, (2) discovery of similarities and differences between the two languages, and (3) prediction of possible difficulties experienced by Indonesians in learning Arabic. Some of the results of this study are: (1) there are several similarities in the use of interrogative tools in Arabic and Indonesian, whether original or not, singular or plural, and both languages have an important role in the form of interrogative sentences; (2) the word order in the use of question tools and interrogative sentences between Arabic and Indonesian is almost the same, and the two have a close relationship; and (3) the time in interrogative sentences in both languages, which can be used to ask about the past, present, or future. However, there are some differences in the form of interrogative sentences between Arabic and Indonesian, such as: (1) in Arabic, interrogative sentences are used to ask for confirmation and descriptions, whereas in Indonesian, interrogative sentences are only used to ask for descriptions; (2) in Arabic, interrogative sentences are carried out using a questioning tool and emphasis on voice, whereas in Indonesian, interrogative sentences can be carried out in three ways, namely only voice emphasis, using question tools and voice stress, and using question tools, voice stress. , and affixes. These differences can be difficult for Indonesians learning Arabic.

References

`Abbās Ḥasan, al-Naḥw al-Wāfī, Dār al-Ma`ārif, al-Qāhirah, al-Ṭab`ah. 3
Abdul aziz dkk. Pedoman Umum Tata bahasa Indonesia. Cetakan Pertama, Jakarta, 2012
`Abd. al-Tawwāb, Ramaḍān, Fuṣūl fī Fiqh al-Lugah, Maktab al-Khānijī, al-Qāhirah, 1999
Abū al-`Abbās Muḥammad ibn Yazīd, al-Muqtaḍab, al-Mubrad, Taḥqīq Ḥasan Ḥamd, Dār al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyyah, Bairūt, 1999
`Amrū ibn `Uṡmān ibn Qanbar, al-Kitāb, Saibūyah, Taḥqīq wa Syarḥ `Abd al-Salām Muḥammad Hārūn, `Ālim al-Kutub, Bairūt, al-Ṭab`ah. 3; 1983
al-`Aṣīlī, `Abd al-Azīz ibn Ibrāhīm, Manāhij al-Baḥṡ fī al-Lugah al-Marḥaliyyah li Muta`allimī al-Lugāt al-Ajnabiyyah, Jāmiah al-Imām Muḥammad ibn Su`ūd al-Islāmiyyah, 2010
al-Azuhrī, Khālid ibn `Abdillāh, Syarḥ al-Taṣrīḥ `alā al-Tauḍīḥ, Taḥqīq Muḥammad Bāsyil `Uyūn al-Saud, Dār al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyyah, Bairūt
al-Anṣārī, ibn Hisyām, Jamāl al-Dīn `Abdullāh ibn Yūsuf, Syarḥ Syużūr al-Żahab fī Ma`rifah Kalām al-`Arab, Qaddam lah wa Waḍa` Hawāmisyah Imīl Ya`qūb, Dār al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyyah, Bairūt, al-Ṭab`ah. 3; 2004
Contrastive analysis: Error analysis and transformational genitive theory of second language learning, Prajapati, in IRAL., Vol, xix/2, May 1981
al-Daulī li al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah bi `Unwān” Mustaqbil al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah fī `Aṣr al-`Ūlimah (Baina al-Amal wa al-Ya’s), al-Mun`aqid fī Jāmi`ah Syarīf Hidāyah Allāh al-Islāmiyyah al-Ḥukūmiyyah, Jākartā- Indūnīsiyā, 9-12 Juli 2012
Djoko Kentjono dkk. Tata Bahasa Acuan Bahasa Indonesia Untuk Penutur Asing. Penerbit Widyasastra, Jakarta, 2010
Fitratullah, Muḥammad Rafīq, al-Naḥt fī al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah wa al-Indūnīsiyyah (Dirāsah Taḥlīliyyah), Risālah Bakālūrīyūs, al-Jāmiah al-Islāmiyyah al-Ḥukūmiyyah Mālānaj-Indūnīsiyā, Kulliyah al-`Ulūm al-Insāniyyah wa al-Ṡaqāfiyyah, Qism al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah wa Ādābihā, 2009
al-Gulāyīnī, Muṣṭafā. Jāmi` al-Darūs al-`Arabiyyah. (Mażīlī bī Baḥṡī al-Balāgah wa al-`Urūḍ), Taḥqīq `alā Sulaimān Syabārah, Muassasah al-Risālah Nāsyirūn, Bairūt, al-Ṭab`ah I, 2008.
Hayati, A.M. A Contrastive Analysis of English and persien stress. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, vol. 32, Poznan, Adam Mickiewi C2, University Poznan, 1977
Ḥijāzī, Muḥammad Fahmī, Madkhal ilā `Ilm al-Lugah: al-Majallāt wa al-Ittijāhāt, Dār Qabā’ al-Ḥadīṡah, al-Qāhirah, al-Ṭab`ah IV; 2007
Ibn Hisyām al-Anṣārī, Jamāl al-Dīn `Abdullāh ibn Yūsuf ibn Aḥmad ibn `Abdullāh, Auḍaḥ al-Masālik ilā Alfiyah ibn Mālik, Qaddam lah wa Waḍa` Hawāmisyah Imīl Ya`qūb, Dār al-Kutub al-`Ilamiyyah, 2007.
Ibn Janī `Uṡmān, Abū al-Fath, al-Khaṣāiṣ, Taḥqīq Muḥammad `Alī al-Najjār, Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah, al-Qāhirah, al-Ṭab`ah, 1952
Ibn Ya`īsy, Badr al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn `Abdullāh, Syarḥ al-Mufaṣṣal, Qaddam lah wa Waḍa` Hawāmisyah Imīl Ya`qūb, Dār al-Kutub al-`Ilmiyyah, Bairūt, al-Ṭab`ah. 1; 2001
Ismail Hussein. Sejarah Pertumbuhan Bahasa Kebangsaan. Kuala Lumpur, 1981
In John H. Schumann & Nancy Stenson (editor). New Frontiers in second Language learning, Ronald Wardhaugh, The contrastive analysis hypothesis. Newbury House Publishers, Int. 1976
al-Istirābāżī, Muḥammadibn al-Ḥasan, Syarh al-Raḍī li Kāfiyah ibn al-Ḥajib, Dirāsah wa Taḥqīq Yaḥya Basyīr Miṣrī, Jāmiah al-Imām Muḥammad ibn Su`ūd al-Islāmiyyah, al-Qism al-Żānī, al-Ṭab`ah. 1; 1996
Jāsim, Jāsim al-`Utaibī, `Abdullāh ibn Muḥammad. Dirāsah Taqābiliyyah baina al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah wa al-Indūnīsiyyah fī al-Ism al-Mauṣūl, baḥṡ Muqaddam ilā: al-Mu`tamir al-Daulī li al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah bi `Unwān” Mustaqbil al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah fī `Aṣr al-`Ūlimah (Baina al-Amal wa al-Ya’s), al-Mun`aqid fī Jāmi`ah Syarīf Hidāyah Allāh al-Islāmiyyah al-Ḥukūmiyyah, Jākartā- Indūnīsiyā, 9-12 Juli 2012
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Edisi ketiga, 2005
Lūbis, Tarkas. al-Taqābil baina al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah wa al-Indūnīsiyyah. Majallah al-Lugah wa Ādābihā, Qism al-`Ulūm al-Insāniyyah wa al-Ṡaqāfih, al-Jāmi`ah al-Islāmiyyah al-Ḥukūmiyyah Mālānuj- Indūnīsiyā, 4, 2, Dīsmbīr, 2009, al-Raqm al-Tasalsalī al-Ma`yārī al-Daulī. 1693-4725
al-Mālikī, Muḥammad ibn `Abdullāh ibn Ṣuwailiḥ, al-Jumlah al-Ṭalibiyyah fī al-Qurān al-Karīm (Dirāsah Naḥwiyyah Naẓariyyah wa Naṭbiqiyyah), (84), Risālah Duktūrāh, fī Jāmi`ah Umm al-Qurā, 2010
Ma`rūf, Farīd. Al-Jumlah al-Fi`liyyah fī al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah wa fī al-Lugah al-Indūnīsiyyah. Risālah Bakālūrīyūs, Jāmiah Syarīf Hidāyah Allāh al-Islāmiyyah al-Ḥukūmiyyah Jakarta-Indūnīsiyā, Kulliyah al-Adab wa al-`Ulūm al-Insāniyyah, Qism al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah wa Ādābihā, 2010
Masnur Muslich, Refika Aditama. Garis-Garis Besar Tatabahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Cetakan kesatu, 2010
Muin, Abdul. Analisis Kontrastif Bahasa Arab & Bahasa Indonesia (Telaah Terhadap Fonetik dan Marfologi). Pustaka Al Husna Baru, Jakarta 2004
Nik Sapiah Karim dkk. Tatabahasa Dewan. Kuala Lumpur, 1993
al-Rājiḥī, `Abdah, al-Taṭbīq al-Naḥwī, Maktabah al-Ma`ārif lī al-Nasyar wa al-Tauzī`, al-Riyāḍ, al-Ṭab`ah I, 1999
al-Rājiḥī, `Abduh, `Ilm al-Lugah al-Taṭbīqī wa Ta`līm al-`Arabiyyah, Dār al-Ma`rifah al-Jāmi`ah, Iskandariyyah, 1990
Ṣīnī, Ismā`iīl, wa Muḥammad al-Amīn, Isḥāq, al-Taqābil al-Lugawī wa Taḥlīl al-Akhṭā’, `Imādah Syuūn al-Maktabāt, Jāmi`ah al-Malik Su`ūd, al-Riyāḍ, 1982
Ṣubḥī Ṣāliḥ, Dirāsāt fī Figh al-Lugah, Dār al-`Ilm al-Malāyīn: Bairūt, 1980
Umm Sa`ādah. Iḍāfah al-Zawāid fī al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah wa al-Indūnīsiyyah (Dirāsah Taḥlīliyyah al-Taqābiliyyah). Risālah Bakālūrīyūs, al-Jāmi`ah al-Islāmiyyah al-Ḥukūmiyyah Mālānuj- Indūnīsiyā, Kulliyyah al-Insāniyyah wa al-Ṡaqāfiyyah, Qism al-Lugah al-`Arabiyyah wa Ādābihā, 2007
Wisnu Sujianto dan Dwi Haryanti. Rangkuman Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia
al-Zarkasyī, Taḥqīq Muḥammad Abū al-Faḍl Ibrāhīm, al-Burhān fī `Ulūm al-Qur`ān, Dār al-Ma`rifī, Bairūt, al-Ṭab`ah II