Rekonstruksi Hak Khiyār sebagai Standar Minimum Retur–Refund dalam Jual Beli Ritel di Indonesia: Harmonisasi Khes dan UU Perlindungan Konsumen

Reconstructing the Right of Option (Khiyar) As A Minimum Return-Refund Standard in Indonesian Retail Trade: Harmonizing Islamic Economic Law (Khes) and Consumer Protection Law

Authors

  • Ahmad Wahyudi Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo (UIN) Semarang, Indonesia
  • Bagas Heradhyaksa Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo (UIN) Semarang, Indonesia
  • Kholid Irfani Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al-Hidayat (STAI) Lasem, Indonesia
  • Pas Inggrid Pamesti Universitas Negeri (UNNES) Semarang, Indonesia
  • Wawaysadhya University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v7i1.2909

Keywords:

consumer protection; khiar; KHES; return–refund policy; standard form contracts

Abstract

Retail transactions in Indonesia frequently apply “no return/no refund” policies through standard terms, creating tension between effective consumer remedies and contractual certainty. This article aims to reconstruct khiar rights under the Indonesian Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES) as a minimum return–refund standard that is compatible with the Consumer Protection Law (UUPK). Using a doctrinal (normative) legal method, the study employs a statute approach to examine UUPK and KHES, a conceptual approach to operationalize khiar (Syarṭ, ru’yah, and ‘aib) as a remedial mechanism, and a harmonization/legal-policy approach to design an implementable standard. The results propose a minimum standard built on six parameters: scope, valid grounds (defect/’aib, mismatch/ru’yah, trial period/Syarṭ), tiered time windows, proportionate evidentiary requirements, remedy hierarchy (repair/replace/refund), and limited exceptions with alternative remedies. The discussion shows that blanket “no return/no refund” clauses are normatively problematic when they eliminate remedies for defect or mismatch, while structured limitations remain permissible to prevent moral hazard and ensure business certainty. The article recommends adopting a model clause and a minimum SOP (complaint–verification–decision–remedy–recording) as auditable compliance instruments for Indonesian retail.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achsan, Achsan, Andri Winjaya Laksana, and Henny Nuraeny. “Tinjauan Yuridis Pencantuman Klausula Eksonerasi Dalam Kontrak Elektronik Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.” Soedirman Law Review 2, no. 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.slr.2020.2.3.93.

Aqmal, Fatihah Zakiya, Muthoifin, and Sana Ashraf. “Legal Protection Against Gharar in Sharia E-Commerce: A Consumer Law Analysis in Support of the SDGs.” Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam 26, no. 2 (2025): 615–30. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v26i02.12036.

Faure, Michael G, and Hanneke A Luth. “Behavioural Economics in Unfair Contract Terms: Cautions and Considerations.” Journal of Consumer Policy 34 (2011): 337–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9162-9.

Fauziah, Rizka, and Ema Fathimah. “Konsep Khiyār Dalam Jual Beli Online Dan Relevansinya Terhadap Perlindungan Konsumen.” Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah Dan Masyarakat 20, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v20i1.6063.

Ghofur, Abdul. “Problematika Perdagangan Online: Telaah Terhadap Aspek Khiyar Dalam E-Commerce.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 10, no. 2 (2016): 295–308. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v10i2.940.

Gumanti, Retna. “Reconceptualizing Consumer Contracts in the Philosophical Perspective of Pancasila.” Prophetic Law Review 1, no. 1 (2019): 37–57. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol1.iss1.art3.

Hafid, Abd., Syamsul Bahri, Sitti Nikmah Marzuki, Musrini Muis, and Rini Idayanti. “The Application of Khiyar Principles to E-Commerce Transaction: The Islamic Economy Perspective.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 8, no. 1 (2024): 403–20. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.20890.

Hassanah, Hetty, Wahyudi Wahyudi, and Norazlina Abdul Aziz. “Standardisasi Klausula Baku Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce Ditinjau Dari Hukum Perdata Indonesia.” Wawasan Yuridika 7, no. 2 (2023): 221–38. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v7i2.4226.

Hipólito, Francisco, Álvaro Dias, and Leandro Pereira. “Influence of Consumer Trust, Return Policy, and Risk Perception on Satisfaction with the Online Shopping Experience.” Systems 13, no. 3 (2025): 158. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13030158.

Jamilah. “Tinjauan Fikih Muamalah Terhadap Penerapan Khiyār Dalam Transaksi E-Commerce.” Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah 6, no. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.46899/jeps.v6i1.87.

Jamilah, and Firmansyah. “Khiyar Ru’yah Sebagai Perlindungan Konsumen: Studi Komparasi Antara Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif.” Journal of Economic and Political Studies 6, no. 1 (2018): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.46899/jeps.v6i1.87.

Janakiraman, Narayan, Holly Syrdal, and Ryan Freling. “The Effect of Return Policy Leniency on Consumer Purchase and Return Decisions: A Meta-Analytic Review.” Journal of Retailing 92, no. 2 (2016): 226–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2015.11.002.

Jeng, Shih-Ping. “Increasing Customer Purchase Intention through Product Return Policies: The Pivotal Impacts of Retailer Brand Familiarity and Product Categories.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 39 (2017): 182–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.013.

Loos, Marco B M, and Joasia Luzak. “Wanted: A Bigger Stick. On Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts with Online Service Providers.” Journal of Consumer Policy, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-015-9303-7.

Madaniyyah, Kholishotul, Irvan Iswandi, and Ahmad Asrof Fitri. “Penerapan Khiyar Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Perspektif Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Di Pasar Haurgeulis Kabupaten Indramayu).” Journal of Islamic Studies 1, no. 2 (2023): 181–95. https://doi.org/10.61341/jis/v1i2.016.

Magano, José, Jana Turčinkova, Mário C Santos, Roxana Correia, and Mikhail Serebriannikov. “Exploring Apparel E-Commerce Unethical Return Experience: A Cross-Country Study.” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research 19, no. 4 (2024): 2650–72. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer19040127.

Mahendar, Fahdelika, and Christiana Tri Budhayati. “Konsep Take It or Leave It Dalam Perjanjian Baku Sesuai Dengan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: Alethea 2, no. 2 (2019): 97–114. https://doi.org/10.24246/alethea.vol2.no2.p97-114.

Masrofah, Masrofah. “The Exoneration Clause Harms the Buyer: Legal Protection for Consumers Against the Application of Exoneration Clauses in Online Sale.” UMPurwokerto Law Review 3, no. 1 (2022): 19–27. https://doi.org/10.30595/umplr.v3i1.10730.

Nugrahaningsih, Widi, and Margaretha Evi Yuliana. “Klausula Baku Sebagai Bentuk Komunikasi Satu Arah Produsen Kepada Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Ritel Modern (Studi Kasus: Barang Yang Sudah Dibeli Tidak Dapat Dikembalikan).” COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat 1, no. 7 (2021). https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v1i7.53.

Oghazi, Pejvak, Stefan Karlsson, Daniel Hellström, and Klas Hjort. “Online Purchase Return Policy Leniency and Purchase Decision: Mediating Role of Consumer Trust.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 41 (2018): 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.12.007.

Pei, Zhi, Audhesh Paswan, and Ruiliang Yan. “E-Tailer’s Return Policy, Consumer’s Perception of Return Policy Fairness and Purchase Intention.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 21, no. 3 (2014): 249–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.01.004.

Poernomo, Sri Lestari. “Standar Kontrak Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 19, no. 1 (2019): 109–20. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2019.V19.109-120.

Rambe, Soraya Hafidzah, and Paramitha Sekarayu. “Perlindungan Hukum Nasabah Atas Gagal Klaim Asuransi Akibat Ketidaktransparanan Informasi Polis Asuransi.” Jurnal Usm Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 93–109. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4073.

Rasyid, Faisal, and Rani Apriani. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Atas Perjanjian Baku Yang Mengandung Klausula Eksonerasi Terhadap Usaha Pengelola Parkir.” Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 7, no. 2 (2024): 456–66. https://doi.org/10.31604/justitia.v7i2.456-466.

Rasyid, Harun Daud. “Concept of Khiyār in Transaction in Islamic Law.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 4, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i2.8148.

Rejeki, Niniek Mumpuni Sri. “Overview of the Concept of Khiyar Al Aib in E-Commerce Practice.” JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies) 6, no. 2 (2022): 218–25. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v6i2.5670.

Rekaiti, Pamaria, and Roger Van den Bergh. “Cooling-Off Periods in the Consumer Laws of the EC Member States. A Comparative Law and Economics Approach.” Journal of Consumer Policy 23 (2000): 371–408. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007203426046.

Rieländer, Frederick. “Policing Consumer Contract Terms under US and EU Law: A Comparative Analysis of the Directive 93/13/EEC on Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts and the Restatement of Consumer Contracts.” German Law Journal 26 (2025): 766–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2025.10138.

Satory, Agus. “Perjanjian Baku Dan Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Transaksi Bisnis Sektor Jasa Keuangan: Penerapan Dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2, no. 2 (2015): 269–90. https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v2n2.a4.

Shao, Bingjia, Zhendong Cheng, Lijuan Wan, and Jie Yue. “The Impact of Cross Border E-Tailer’s Return Policy on Consumer’s Purchase Intention.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 59 (2021): 102367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102367.

Siregar, M H, and I R Nasution. “Analisis Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Pengguna Shopee Dalam Transaksi Belanja Online.” Journal of Education, Humaniora … 7, no. 1 (2024): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v7i1.222.

Sulistyaningrum, Helena Primadianti, and Dian Afrilia. “Klausula Baku Dalam Perspektif Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen.” Simbur Cahaya 27, no. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v27i1.807.

Syamsudin, M. “The Failure of the Court to Protect Consumers: A Review of Consumer Dispute Resolution in Indonesia.” Journal of Consumer Policy 44, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-020-09470-0.

Tayeb, Azmil. Islamic Education in Indonesia and Malaysia : Shaping Minds, Saving Souls. New York: Routledge, 2018.

Yuanitasari, Dwi, and Hazar Kusmayanti. “Eksistensi Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Sebagai Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Indonesia.” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 7, no. 3 (2019): 425–35. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v7i3.676.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Rekonstruksi Hak Khiyār sebagai Standar Minimum Retur–Refund dalam Jual Beli Ritel di Indonesia: Harmonisasi Khes dan UU Perlindungan Konsumen: Reconstructing the Right of Option (Khiyar) As A Minimum Return-Refund Standard in Indonesian Retail Trade: Harmonizing Islamic Economic Law (Khes) and Consumer Protection Law. (2026). BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam , 7(1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v7i1.2909