Jasa sebagai Mahar Pernikahan dalam Perspektif Empat Mazhab

Services as a Wedding Dowry in the Perspective of the Four Schools of Thought

  • Syandri Syandri Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar
  • Zaiz Zulfikar Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar
Keywords: services, dowry, marriage, perspective, sect

Abstract

This study aims to find out the views of the school's scholars about services as a marriage dowry by comparing opinions and expressing differences and similarities of opinion of the four schools of thought. The problems raised in this research; First, how is the concept of service as a marriage dowry in the view of the four schools of thought. Second, what are the similarities and differences in views on merit as a marriage dowry according to the four schools of thought. This study uses library research using the normative juridical approach and the comparative approach. The research results found are as follows; First, the Maliki, Syafii and Hambali scholars generally allow services as a dowry or as a result of wages from services. As for the Hanafi school of thought, the dowry must be in the form of property, while the law of origin of the benefits of services cannot be equated with wealth. Second, the four schools agreed to make the marriage contract valid even though the Hanafi school required the husband to replace it with a Misil dowry. The difference of opinion between these four schools of thought lies in the dowry in the form of teaching the Qur'an. The Maliki, Shafi'i and Hambali scholars allow it while the Hanafi school of law forbids it.

References

‘Abd al-Raḥmān al-Jazīrī. Kitāb Al-Fiqh ‘Alā Al-Mażāhib Al-Arba’Ah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiah, 2003.
’Abd al-‘Aẓīm Badawī. Al-Wajīz Fī Fiqh Al-Sunnah Wa Al-Kitāb Al-‘Azīz. III. al-Manșūrah: Dār Ibn Rajab, 2001.
Abdullāh bin Ṣaliḥ al-Fauzān. Minḥah Al- ‘Allām Fī Syarḥ Bulūgh Al-Marām. 1st ed. al-Dammām: Dār al-Jauzī, n.d.
Abdurrahman, Dudung. “Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Dan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah.” Yogyakarta: Ikfa, 1998.
Abū ‘Abdullāh Muḥammad Ibn Ismā’īl al-Bukhārī. Ṣahīh Al-Bukhārī. Dimasyq: Dār ibn Katsīr, 2002.
Abū al-Ḥasan ‘Alī bin Sulaimān al-Mardāwī. Al-Inṣāf, 1955.
Abū Bakr bin Mas’ūd al-Kasānī. Badāi’ Al-Ṣanāi’ Fī Tartīb Al-Syarāi’. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2003.
Abū Muḥammad ‘Abdullāh bin Aḥmad bin Muḥammad al-Maqdisī. Al-Mughnī. Riyāḍ: Dār ‘Ālim al-Kutub, 1998.
Abū Zakariyya Muḥy al-Dīn bin Syaraf al-Nawawī. Kitāb Al-Majmū’ Syarḥ Al-Muhażżab Li Al-Syairāzī. Jeddah: Maktabah al-Irsyād, n.d.
AF’IDAH, N U R. “PENERAPAN MAHAR BERUPA JASA (Studi Di Kantor Urusan Agama Sulang Rembang).” STAIN KUDUS, 2017.
Aḥmad bin Muḥammad bin Salāmah al-Ṭaḥawī. Mukhtaṣar Ikhtilāf Al-‘Ulamā. Bairūt: Dār al-Basyāir al-Islāmiyyah, 1996.
Al-Andalusi, Al-Imām Abu al-Walīd Muhammad bin Ahmad Ibnu Rusyd al-Qurtubi. Bidāyah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihāyah Al-Muqtaṣid. Juz 1. Kairo: Dār Ibnu al-Jauzi, 2014.
Al-Imām Abū ‘Abd al-Raḥmān Aḥmad bin Syu’aib al-Nasāī. Sunan Al-Nasāī Al-Ṣugrā. Al-Mamlakah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Su’ūdiyyah: Dār al-Salām, 1999.
Al-Imam Kamāl al-Dīn Muḥammad bin ‘Abd al-Wāḥid al-Sīwāsī. Syarḥ Fatḥ Al-Qadīr. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiah, 2003.
Ālī bin ‘Umar al-Dārquṭnī. Sunan Al-Dārquṭnī. Bairūt: Dār al-Ma’rifah, 2001.
Alī bin Aḥmad bin Sa’īd bin Ḥazm al-Andalusī. Al-Muḥallā Bi Al-Āṡār. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2003.
Departemen Agama RI. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya. Jakarta: Penerbit Ummul Qura, 2017.
Hakim, Muhammad Luqman. “Konsep Mahar Dalam Al-Qurán Dan Relevansinya Dengan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI).” Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2018.
Imron, Imron. “Konsep Mahar Berupa Jasa Menurut Imam Syafi’i Dan Abu Hanifah Serta Relevansinya Dalam Hukum Perkawinan Islam Di Indonesia.” UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2017.
Ismā’īl bin ‘Umar bin Kaṡīr al-Qurasyī al-Dimasyqī. Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān Al-‘Āẓīm. Riyāḍ: Dār al-Ṭayyibah, 1999.
Manṣur bin Yūnus bin Ṣalaḥ al-Dīn Ibn Ḥasan bin Aḥmad Ibn Ālī bin Idrīs al-Buhūtī. Al-Rauḍ Al-Murbi’ Syarḥ Zād Al-Mustaqni. al-Riyāḍ: Madār al-Waṭn, 2005.
Muḥammad bin Aḥmad bin ‘Uṡmān al-Żahabī. Mīzān Al-I’tidāl Fī Naqd Al-Rijāl. Beirut: Dār al-Ma’rifah, n.d.
Muḥammad bin Idris al-Syāfi’ī. Al-Umm. al-Manșūrah: Dār al-Wafā’, 2001.
Muḥammad Ṣalih al-‘Uṡaimīn. Al-Syarḥ Al-Mumti’ ‘Alā Zād Al-Mustaqni.’ Dammām: Dār Ibn Jauzī, 2012.
Muslim bin al-Ḥajjāj al-Qusyairī al-Naisābūrī. Ṣahīh Muslim. al-Riyāḍ: Dār Ṭayyibah, 2006.
Philip Babcock Gove. Webster Third New International Dictionary. Massachussets: Meriam Company, 1996.
Ṣaliḥ Fauzān ‘Abdullāh al-Fauzān. Al-Mulakhaṣ Al-Fiqhī. 1st ed. al-Azhar: al-Dār al-‘Ālamiyyah, 2015.
Soejono, and H Abdurrahman. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Rineke Cipta, 2003.
Wahbah al-Zuhailī. Al-Fiqh Al-Islāmī Wa Adillatuhu. Sūriyah Dimasyq: Dār al-Fikr, 1985.
Yanggo, Huzaemah Tahido. Pengantar Perbandingan Mazhab. Logos, 2003.
Yūsuf bin ‘Abdullāh bin Muḥammad bin ‘Abd al-Barr al-Andalusī. Al-Istiżkār. al-Qāhirah: Dār al-Wa’ā, 1993.
Published
2022-04-05
Statistic
Viewed: 62
Downloaded: 43
How to Cite
Syandri, S., & Zulfikar, Z. (2022). Jasa sebagai Mahar Pernikahan dalam Perspektif Empat Mazhab. BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam , 3(1), 47-67. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v3i1.519

Most read articles by the same author(s)