Tinjauan Hukum Islam dalam Keabsahan Pernikahan dengan Kitābiyāt Perspektif Para Sahabat dan Ulama Kontemporer

Islamic Legal Review on the Validity of Marriage with Kitābiyāt Perspectives of the Sahaba and Contemporary Scholars

Authors

  • Abdurrahman Institut Agama Islam STIBA Makassar, Indonesia
  • Ronny Mahmuddin Institut Agama Islam STIBA Makassar, Indonesia
  • Awal Rifai Institut Agama Islam STIBA Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36701/muntaqa.v1i1.2380

Keywords:

IslamicLaw, Kitābiyāt marriage, validity, scholarly perspectives

Abstract

This study examines the validity of marriage between Muslim men and women from the People of the Book (kitābiyāt) from the perspective of Islamic law, by exploring the views of the Prophet’s companions and contemporary scholars, as well as the legal implications of such marriages. The study aims to understand the Syarī‘ah foundations and evidences used by the companions, and how these views are interpreted by modern scholars in contemporary social and global contexts. The main issues discussed in this research include: 1) How the companions and contemporary scholars view the legal validity of such marriages; and 2) What are the legal implications of Islamic law regarding the practice of these marriages in today's religious and social contexts. This study uses a library research method with a normative-theological approach, drawing upon sources such as books, journals, scholarly articles, theses, and classical and contemporary Islamic texts. The research applies a qualitative approach through literature analysis, including interpretations of Qur’anic verses, hadiths, and scholarly opinions. The findings indicate that the majority of the Prophet’s companions permitted such marriages based on Qur’an Surah al-Mā'idah [5]:5. However, contemporary scholars emphasize the importance of considering the social context, family identity, and child upbringing. The study concludes that although the practice is textually permissible under Islamic law, its implementation requires careful consideration of contemporary public interest (maṣlaḥah).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Qur’ān al-Karīm

Buku:

Al-Baihaqī Abū Bakr Aḥmad ibn al-Ḥusain ibn ‘Alī, Al-Sunan al-Kubrā, Juz 7, (Cet. 3, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1424 H/2003 M).

Al-Bukhārī, Abū ‘Abdillāh Muḥammad ibn Ismā’īl, Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī , juz 2, (Cet. I; Bairūt: Dār Ibn Kaṡīr, 1423 H/2002 M).

Al-Ḥusain, Abū Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj ibn Muslim al-Qusyairī al-Naysābūrī, Al-Jāmi‘ al-Ṣaḥīḥ “Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim” juz 4 (cet. I;Turki: Dār al-Ṭibā‘ah al-‘Āmirah, 1334 H/1915 M).

Al-Imam Taqi al-Dīn Abi Bakr ibn Muḥammad al-Ḥusaini al-Damsyiqi al-Syāfī’ī, Kifāyah al-Akhyār fī Ḥallī Gāyah al-Ikhtiṣār, Semarang: Usaha Keluarga, t.th., Juz 2,, Semarang: Usaha Keluarga, t.th., Juz 2.

Al-Jaziri Abdurrahmān, Al-Fiqh ‘ala Madzahib al-Arba’ah, Jilid IV ( Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1986 ).

Al-Qarḍāwī Yūsuf, Al-Ḥalāl wa al-Ḥarām fī al-Islām, juz 3 (Kairo: al-Maktab al-Islami, 1993).

Al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn, Tafsīr al-Kabīr, Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb, juz 26, (Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī)

Al-Shābūni Muḥammad ‘Ali, Rawa'i‘ al-Bayān fī Tafsīr Ayat al-Aḥkām, jilid 1,(cet. I; al-Azhar: Dar al-ālamiah,2015).

Al-Syāfiʿī, abū ʿAbdillāh Muḥammad bin Idrīs, Al-Umm ,cet. 2, juz 5 (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1403 H/1983 M), h. 114-115.

Al-Syaukānī, Muḥammad bin ‘Alī bin Muḥammad bin ‘Abdullāh al-Yamanī, Fatḥ al-Qadīr, juz 2, (Cet. 1, Beirut: Dar al-Kalam al-Ṭayyib, 1414H/1994M).

Al-Zuḥailī Wahbah bin Muṣṭafā, Wasathiyyat al-Islām wa Samāḥatuhu.

Al-Zuḥailī, Wahbah bin Muṣṭafā, Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Adillatuhu, Juz 9, Cet. ke-XX, (Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1984).

Ibn Abi ̅ Syaibah, Abu Bakr Abdullah ibn Muḥammad al-‘Absi al-Ku ̅fī, Al-Muṣannaf, (cet. 1 juz 9 Riyaḍ: Dar Kunuz Isybiliya, 1436 H/2015 M).

Ibn Katsir, Abu al-Fida’ Ismā‘īl ibn ‘Umar al-Qurasyi al-Baṣri, Tafsir al-Qur'an al-‘Aẓim, juz 1, (cet. I; Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1419 H/1998 M).

Ibn Qudāmah, Al-Muwaffaq Abū Muḥammad ʿAbdullāh ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad al-Maqdisī al-Jamāʿīlī al-Dimashqī al-Ṣāliḥī al-Ḥanbalī, Al-Mughnī, juz 9, (cet. III; Riyāḍ: Dār ʿĀlam al-Kutub liṭ-Ṭibāʿah wa al-Nasyri wa al-Tawzīʿ, 1417 H/1997 M).

Ibnū Mājah Abū Abdillah Muḥammad ibn Yazīd al-Qazwīnī "Sunan Ibnu Mājah",juz 1 (Cet. I; Kairo: Dar Ihya al-Kutub al-'Arabiyyah, 1313 H/1895 M).

Maḥmūd ibn Aḥmad ibn Mūsā ibn Aḥmad ibn al-Ḥusain, Al-Ibnāyah Syarḥ al-Hidāyah, Juz 5, (Cet. I, Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1420 H/2000 M).

Muḥammad ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī, Abū Jaʿfar, Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān, juz 4, cet. -; Makkah al-Mukarramah: Dār al-Tarbiyah wa al-Turāth, 310 H/923 M).

Qal'ajī, Muḥammad Rawās, Mu’jam Lugah Al-Fuqahā’.( Beirut: Dar al-Nafais, 1996).

Sābiq Sayyid, Fiqh al-Sunnah, juz 2 (Cet, 3;Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-‘Arabī, 1397 H/1977 M).

Jurnal Ilmiah:

Al-Shiddiqey, T. M. H. Falsafat Hukum Islam, (Cet. IV; Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1990).

Amir Syarifuddin.Ushul Fiqih Jilid 1. (Jakarta: Kencana, 2011).

Amri, Aulil. “Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam.” Media Syari’ah 22, no. 1 (2020).

Halim, Abdul, dan Carina Rizky Ardhani. "Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama Diluar Negeri Dalam Tinjauan Yuridis." Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan 1.1 (2016): 67-75.

Harun Nasution, Islam Ditinjau dari Berbagai Aspeknya, Jilid 1 (Jakarta: UI Press, 1985).

https://newsmaker.tribunnews.com/2024/03/30/7-artis-nekat-menikah-meski-beda-agama-langgeng-setia-temani-pasangan-ibadah-ada-nana-mirdad?page=2, ( 20/02/2025 ).

Imron Mustofa, “Jendela Logika dalam Berfikir: Deduksi dan Induksi sebagai Dasar Penalaran Ilmiah”, El-Banat: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam 6, no. 2 (2016).

Iryani, E. Hukum Islam, Demokrasi dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, (2017).

Jasser Auda, Maqasid al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach (London: IIIT, 2008).

Kamal Mukhtar, Asas-asas Hukum Islam Tentang Perkawinan, (Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1974).

Luluk Nur Hamidah, “Makna Pernikahan sebagai Mītsāqan Ghalīẓan dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam”, Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, IAIN Purwokerto, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2017.

M. Amin Abdullah, Studi Agama: Normativitas atau Historisitas? (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1999)

Marinu Waruwu, “Pendekatan Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mixed Method)”, Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 7, no. 1 (2023).

Muannif Ridwan, dkk, “Pentingnya Penerapan Literature Review pada Penelitian Ilmiah”, Jurnal Masohi 2, no. 1 (2021).

Palandi, Anggreini Carolina. Analisa Yuridis Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia. Lex Privatum, (2013).

Ramli., Pernikahan Beda Agama Dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Kehidupan Rumah Tangga (Sudut Pandang Al-Qur’an), Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, (2024).

Sudarsono, Hukum Keluarga Nasional, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1997).

Widiyanto, Hari. "Konsep pernikahan dalam Islam (Studi fenomenologis penundaan pernikahan di masa pandemi)." Jurnal Islam Nusantara 4.1 (2020),

Yunus, Fakhrurrazi M., and Zahratul Aini. "Perkawinan beda agama dalam undang-undang nomor 23 tahun 2006 tentang administrasi kependudukan (tinjauan hukum Islam)." Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial 20.2 (2020),

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Tinjauan Hukum Islam dalam Keabsahan Pernikahan dengan Kitābiyāt Perspektif Para Sahabat dan Ulama Kontemporer: Islamic Legal Review on the Validity of Marriage with Kitābiyāt Perspectives of the Sahaba and Contemporary Scholars. (2025). AL-MUNTAQA: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Bahasa Arab, 1(1), 25-45. https://doi.org/10.36701/muntaqa.v1i1.2380