Kedudukan Persaksian Orang Buta dalam Peradilan Islam (Studi Komparasi Mazhab Hanafi dan Mazhab Hambali)
The Position of Testimony by Blind People in Islamic Jurisprudence: A Comparative Study of the Hanafi and Hambali School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36701/muntaqa.v1i1.2391Keywords:
testimony, blind person, islamic judiciary, hanafi, hambaliAbstract
This article analyzes the comparative legal status of a blind person’s testimony according to the Hanafi and Hambali schools of thought. This research employs a descriptive qualitative method through library research, using a normative legal and comparative approach. The study finds that while both schools of Thought are grounded in the principle of justice, they apply different approaches. The Hanafi school of Thought generally rejects the testimony of a blind person, emphasizing the necessity of evidence that can be visually verified. In contrast, the Hambali school of Thought is more accommodating, allowing blind individuals to testify in matters that can be proven through hearing, provided the judge attains strong conviction in the truthfulness of the testimony. This research is expected to contribute to the development of a just Islamic legal framework and serve as a reference for academic scholarship and a source of information for society in general.
Downloads
References
Al-Qur’an al-Karīm
Buku
Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1431 H/2010 M.
Al-Buhūtī, Manṣūr ibn Yūnus. Kasysyāf al-Qinā’i ‘an Matni al-Iqnā’i. Cet. I; al-Mamlakah al-‘Arabiyah al-Su’udiyyah: Wizāra al-‘Adli, 1421 H/2000 M.
Al-Dimasyqī, Imād al-Dīn Abū al-Fidā’ Ismā‘īl ibn ‘Umar ibn Kaṡīr. Tafsīr al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1419 H/1998 M.
Al-Iftāʼ, Wihdah al-Baḥṡ al-‘Ilmī bi Idārah. Al-Maẓāhib al-Fiqhiyyah al-Arba‘ah: Aʼimmatuhā-Aṭwāruhā-Uṣūluhā-Āṡāruhā. Cet. I; Kuwait: Dār al-Iftāʼ, 1436 H/2015 M.
Al-Kāsānī, Abū Bakr ibn Mas’ūd ibn Aḥmad. Badā’i fī Tartībi al-Syarā’i. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 1327 H.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. Al-Qur’an dan Tejemahannya. T. Cet. Bandung: Cordoba, 2018.
Al-Kūfī, Abū Bakr ʿAbdullah ibn Muḥammad ibn Abī Shaybah. Al-Muṣannaf fī al-Aḥādīṡ wa al-Āṡār. Cet. I; Riyāḍ: Maktabah al-Rusyd, 1409 H/1989 M.
Al-Maqdisī, Abdullāh ibn Aḥmad ibn Muhammad ibn Qudāmah. Al-Kāfī fī Fiqh al-Imām Aḥmad. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 1414 H/1994 M.
Al-Maqdisī, ‘Abdullāh ibn Aḥmad ibn Muhammad ibn Qudāmah. Al-Mugnī. Juz 14. Cet. III; Riyāḍ: Dār al-‘Ālam al-Kutub, 1417 H/1997 M.
Al-Margīnānī, Burhānuddīn Abū al-Ḥasan ʿAlī bin Abī Bakr. Al-Hidāyah fī Syarḥ Bidāyah al-Mubtadī. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāṡ, 1425.
Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Al-Naisābūrī, Abū ʿAbdullāh Muḥammad ibn ʿAbdullāh al-Ḥākim. Al-Mustadrak ʿalā al-Ṣaḥīḥain, (Cet. I; Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah: Beirūt, 1411 H/1990 M, h. 110.
Al-Ḥanafī, Muḥammad ibn ‘Alī ibn Muḥammad ibn ‘Abdurraḥmān. Al-Dur al- Mukhtār Syarḥu Tanwīri al-Abṣār wa Jāmi’u al-Biḥāri. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 1423 H/2002 M.
Al-Qaṭṭān, Mannā’ ibn Khalīl. Tārīkh al-Tasyrī’ al-Islāmī. Cet. V; Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah, 1422 H/ 2001 M.
Al-Rabbāt, Khālid. Al-Jāmiʿ li ʿUlūm al-Imām Aḥmad. Cet. I; Miṣr: Dār al-Falāḥ li al-Baḥṡ al-ʿIlmī wa Taḥqīq al-Turāṡ, 1430 H/2009 M.
Al-Ṣanḥājī, ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd Muḥammad Ibn Bādīs. Tafsīr Ibn Bādīs Fī Majālis al-tażkīr min Kalām al-Ḥakīm al-Khabīr. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyah, 1416 H/1995 M).
Al-Syaikh, Ṣāliḥ ibn ‘Abd al-‘Azīz Ālu. Al-Fiqh al-Muyassar. Cet. I; Riyāḍ: Dār A’lām al-Sunnah, 1430 H/2009 M.
Al-Ṭayyār, Abdullāh bin Muḥammad dkk. Al-Fiqh al-Muyassar, (Cet. II; Riyāḍ: Madārik al-Waṭan li al-Nasyr, 1432 H/20011 M), h. 113-116.
Al-Żahabī, Syams al-Dīn Abū ‘Abdillāh ibn Muḥammad. Siyar A’lām al-Nubalā’. Cet. IX; Beirūt: al-Risālah, 1413 H.
Zaid, Bakr ibn ‘Abdullāh Abū. Al-Madkhal al-Mufaṣṣal ilā Fiqh al-Imām Aḥmad. Cet. I; Dār al-‘Āṣimah li al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzī’, 1417 H/ 1996 M.
Zed, Mustika. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Cet. III; Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2014.
al-Zuḥailī, Wahbah ibn Muṣṭafā. Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Adillatuhu. Juz 8. Cet. IV; Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr, t.th.
Jurnal
Hresnawanza, Muhammad Heru. “Perspektif Ulama’ Syafi’iyah dan Hanafiyah tentang Kehujjahan Persaksian Orang Cacat Indera”, Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah 1, no. 2 (2021).
Rasyid, Arbanur. “Kesaksian dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam". Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial 6, no. 1 (2020): h. 29–41. doi:10.24952/el-qanuniy.v6i1.2442.
Sholeh, Akhmad. “Islam dan Penyandang Disabilitas: Telaah Hak Aksesibilitas Penyandang Disabilitas terhadap Pendidikan”. Jurnal An-Nur 6, no. 2 (2014): h. 253-280.
Yunta, Akhmad Hanafi Dain, dkk.. “Kesaksian Tunanetra dalam Tindak Perzinaan Perspektif Fikih Jinayah.” AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab 3, no. 5 (2024): h. 866–886. doi:10.36701/qiblah.v3i5.1748.
Desertasi, Tesis, dan Skripsi
Hamsidar. “Kedudukan Saksi Perempuan dalam Peradilan Islam (Studi Perbandingan Mazhab Syafii dan Hanafi)”. Skripsi. Makassar: Fak. Syariah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab, 2017.
Hikam, Ahmad Bahrul. “Konstruksi Takīf Penyandang Disabilitas dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an". Disertasi. Jakarta: PPs Institut PTIQ, 2023.
Reskiani, Anugrah. “Tinjauan Hukum Kedudukan Disabilitas (Studi Komparasi Hukum Islam dan UU No. 4 tahun 1997)”. Skripsi. Makassar: UIN Alauddin, 2015.
Sofiyandi, Achmad Afik. “Analisis Hukum Islam terhadap pandangan Wahbah Al-Zuḥaylī tentang perceraian dengan alasan istri penyandang cacat”. Skripsi. Surabaya:UIN Sunan Ampel, 2019.
Situs Resmi Pemerintah, Perundang-undangan, dan Dokumen Resmi Pemerintah
Republik Indonesia, "Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 8 Tahun 2016 tentang Penyandang Disabilitas", Bab III, Pasal 5 dan Pasal 9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Azizah, Kasman Bakry, Eka Syahriani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.