Perspektif Fikih Islam Terkait Ṣulḥ Fuḍūlī dalam Proses Perdamaian Pihak Bersengketa
The Islamic Jurisprudence Perspective on Ṣulḥ Fuḍūlī in the Peace Process Between Disputing Parties
Abstract
Sulh fuduli is a peace-making effort conducted by a third party without formal authority. In Islamic jurisprudence, the legitimacy of sulh fudhuli is recognized, though there are differences among jurists across various schools of thought regarding its specifics, procedures, and conditions. This study aims to understand the perspectives of Islamic jurists on Sulh Fuduli in the peace process between disputing parties, using a qualitative research approach and literature review method. The results of this research indicate that Islamic jurists have significant views on the role of third parties in the peace process to resolve disputes, analyzing arbitration and conciliation sulh. In this context, it is important to understand the concepts of peace, dispute, and mediation in Islam, and to maintain legitimate peace objectives in accordance with religious principles. Consequently, this study contributes to the understanding of the role of third parties in creating harmonious peace within society. The application of this concept is also discussed in the contexts of trade and marriage, showing analogies between unauthorized transactions in various types of contracts. Classical literature emphasizes that peace made by a third party can be considered legitimate in certain situations where such peace provides benefits to the defendant and does not harm the involved parties.
References
Al-Qur'ān al-Karīm
Buku:
Abbas, Syahrizal, Mediasi dalam Hukum Syariah, Hukum Adat, & Hukum Nasional, Jakarta: Kencana, 2001.
Afandi>, ‘Ali> H{aidar Khuwa>jah Ami>n. Durar al-H{ukka>m Fi> Syarh} Majallah al-Ahka>m. Juz 4. Cet; 1: t.t. Da>r al-Ji>l. 1411 H/1991 M.
Afifuddin. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia. 2009.
Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Edisi I. Cet. II; Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2010.
Amriani,Nurnaningsih. Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. 2012.
Aqimuddin, Putra dan Eka An. Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa di ASEAN: Lembaga dan Proses. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. 2011.
Al-Asqa>la>ni>, Ah}mad bin ‘Ali> bin Hajar. Fath} al-Ba>ri>. Juz 9. Cet I; Mesir: al-Maktabah al-Salafiyyah. 1380-1390 H.
Basri, Cik Hasan. Peradilan Agama di Indonesia. Jakarta; Raja Grafindo. 2003.
Al-D{oha>k, Muh}ammad bin ‘I
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa. 2018.
Dīn, ʿAlī bin Abī Bakr bin ʿAbd al-Jalīl al-Fargānī al-Margīnānī. Abū al-Ḥasan Burhān. al-Hidāyah fī Sharḥ Bidāyat al-Mubtadī. Juz 3. Beyrut. Dār Iḥyāʾ. t.th.
Garner ed, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary Ninth Edition. USA; Thomson Reuters. 2009. h. 1070.
Goodpaster, Gary. Negosiasi dan Mediasi: Sebuah Pedoman Negosiasi dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Melaluii Negosias. Jakarta: ELIPS Project. 1993.
Al-Hanafi>, ‘Ala>uddi>n bin Abu> Bakr bin Mas’u>d al-Ka>sa>ni>. Bada>I’ al-S}ana>I’ Fi> Tarti>b al-Syara>I’. Juz 6 Cet; 1: t.t. Da>r al-‘Ilmiyyah. 1327-1328 H.
Al-Hanafī, ‘Ala’ al-Dīn Alī bin Khalīl al-Tarablīsī. Mu’īn al-Hukkām fī Mā Yataraddad Baina al-Khashmaini min al-Ahkām. Cet. I: Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. t.th.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka, 1995.
Kanowitz, Leo. Alternatif Dispute Resolution (ADR). t.t., t.p., t.th.
Kementrian Agama R.I. Al-Qur’an dan Terjemahnya. Bandung: Cordoba 2019.
Al-Islamiyyah, Waza>rah al-Auqaf wa al-Syuūn. al-Mausu>’ah al-Fiqh}iyyah al-Kuwaitiyyah. Juz 32. Cet. I; Mesir: Mat}a>bi’ Da>r al-S{afwah. 1427 H.
Al-Mawardi>, Abu> al-H{asan ‘Ali> bin Muh}ammad bin Habi>b. al-H{awi> al-Kabi>r fi> Fiqh} Mazhab al-Syafi’i>. Juz 6. Cet. I; Beirut: Da>r al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah. 1419 H/1999 M.
Al-Maliki, Ibnu ‘Arafah. Syarh} al-Hudu>d. Cet. I; Beirut: al-Maktabah al-Ilmiyah. 1350 H.
Al-Maliki, Muh}ammad bin Muh}ammad al-Tarablisi al-H{at}t}a>b. Mawa>h}ib al-Jali>l fi> Syarh} Mukhtas}ar Khali>l. Juz 5 Cet. III; Beirut: Da>r al-Fikr. 1412 H/1992 M.
Al-Maqdisi, ‘Abdulla>h bin Ah}mad bin Muh{ammad bin Quda>mah. al-Mugni>. Juz 7. Cet; III. Riyadh: Da>r ‘A>lim al-Kutub Li> al-T{oba>’ah wa al-Nasyr wa al-Tauzi>’. 1417 H/1997 M.
Al-Maqdisi, ‘Abdulla>h bin Ah}mad bin Muh{ammad bin Quda>mah. al-Mugni>. Juz 8. Cet; I. Riyadh. Maktabah al-Qa>hirah. 1388-1389 H/1968-1969 M.
Mas'u>d, 'Ubaydilla>h bin. Syarh al-Wiqa>yah. Juz 4. Cet. I; ‘A>mman>. Da>r al-Wara>q. 2006 M.
Merills, J.G. International Dispute Settlement. 5thed. Cambridge: Cambridgr University Press. 2011.
Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cet I; Mataram. Mataram University Press. 2020.
Ibra>hi>m Must}afa>, et.al. al-Mu’jam al-Wasi>t}. Juz 2 Dar al-Da’wah. t.th.
Nurcholish, Ahmad. Peace Education & Pendidikan Perdamaian Gus Dur. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Qal’aji, Muh}ammad Qal’aji. et. al. Mu’jam Lughah al-Fuqaha>’. Cet. II; Da>r al-Nafais. 1408 H/1988 M.
Al-Qurt}ubi, Muh}ammad bin Ah}mad bin Muh}ammad bin Ah}mad bin Rusyd >. Bida>yah al-mujtahid wa Niha>yah al-muqtas{id. Juz 4. Kairo: Da>r al-H{adi>s} 1425 H/2004 M.
Al-Qazwaini, Ahmad bin Faris. Mu’jam Maqayis al-Lughah. Tahqiq: Abd al-Salam Muhammad Harun. Juz 3 Cet. I; Beirut: Dar al-Fikr. 1399 H/1979 M.
Al-Ra>zi>, Abu> Ali> Miskawaih. Taja>rab al-Umam wa Ta’a>qab al-Humam. Juz 6. Cet I; Tuhra>n. Da>r Suru>sy. 2000-2002 M.
Raihan, Metodologi Penelitian. Universitas Islam Jakarta. Jakarta. 2017. h. 137.
Al-Sarakhsi>, Muhammad bin Ah{mad bin Abi> Sahl. Syarh al-Siyar al-Kabi>r. t.t. al-Syirkah al-Syarqiyyah Li> al-I’la>na>t. 1971 M.
Al-Sarakhsi>, Muhammad bin Ah{mad bin Abi> Sahl. al-Mabsu>t}. Juz 20. Beirut: Da>r al-Ma’rifah. t.th.
Supramono, Gatot. Menyelesaikan Sengketa Merek Menurut Hukum, Rineka Cipta,2008.
Al-Syirbi>ji>, Mus}t}afa al-Khin wa Mus}t}afa al-Buga wa ‘Ali>. Al-Fiqh al-Manhaji> ‘Ala> Maz\hab al -Ima>m al-Sya>fi’i>I. Juz 6. Cet IV; Damaskus. Da>r al-Qalam. 1413 H/1992 M.
Al-Żahabī, Syams al-Di>n Abu> ‘Abdilla>h Muhammad bin Ahmad. Ta>ri>kh al-Isla>m wa Wafaya>t al-Ma>sya>hir wa al-A’la>m. Juz 26. Cet; t.t. al-Maktabah al-Taufi>qiyyah. t.th.
Jurnal Ilmiah:
Lestari. Rika. "Perbandingan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Mediasi Di Pengadilan Dan Di Luar Pengadilan Di Indonesia". Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4. no. 2 2013: h. 2-3.
Mapuna. Hadi Daeng. “Islam dan Negara". Al Daulah. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan 6. no. 1 2017: h-1.
Disertasi, Tesis, Skripsi:
Hendry. Eka. “Sosiologi Konflik: Telaah Teoritis Seputar Konflik dan Perdamaian”. Skripsi. STAIN Pontianak Press. 2009.
Muflikhudin, Ahmad. "Akad As-Sulhu Sebagai Induk Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Mu’amalah Menurut Imam Jalaludin As-Suyuti"’, As-Salam, Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam & Pendidikan, 9 no.1 (2020).
Muslim HD. Ahmad Tri. “Pesan Perdamaian dalam Al-Qur’an Kajian Tah}li>li> Terhadap QS. Al-Nisa>’/4: 86”. Skripsi. Makassar: Fak. Ushuluddin Filsafat dan Politik UIN Alauddin Makassar. 2017.
Putra, T. Indra. "Perdamaian Dalam Membagi Harta Warisan Menurut Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Kelurahan Selatpanjang Kecamatan Tebing Tinggi", Skripsi (Pekanbaru: Fak. Syari'ah dan Hukum Islam UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, 2010)
Sinilele. Zulkarnain Ahmad. Nila Sastrawati. and Ashar. "Peranan Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama Makassar Kelas 1A". Skripsi. Makassar: Fak. Hukum Ekonomi Syariah UIN Alauddin Makassar. 2021.
Sulistiantono. Agus. "Perdamaian Dalam Persepektif Al-Qur’an: Kajian Atas Penafsiran Mufasir Nusantara". Skripsi. Jakarta: Fak. Ushuluddin UIN Syarif Hidayatullah. 2019.
Copyright (c) 2024 Nico Akbar, Rapung Rapung, Awal Rifai
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.