Kontroversi Perbudakan dalam Perspektif Kaidah al-Aṣl fī al- Abḍā’ al-Tahrīm

Slavery Controversy in the Perspective of the Rules of al-Aṣl fī al-Abḍā' al-Tahrīm

  • Asri Asri Sekolah Tinggi Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar
  • Fauziah Ramdani Sekolah Tinggi Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar
  • Aswar Aswar Sekolah Tinggi Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar
  • Andi Ruqayyah Rahman Sekolah Tinggi Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar
Keywords: Slavery, controversy, rule perspectve

Abstract

This study aims to determine the explanation of slavery in the view of Islam and resolve the slavery controversy raised by liberals and non-Muslims who are trying to attack Islam with accusations of human rights violations and to find out in more detail the legal discussion of sexual relations outside of marriage (non-marital) in the perspective of the rules of al-Aṣl fī al-abḍā' al-tahrīm. This research is a descriptive-qualitative research with a normative juridical approach to analyze the data and obtain conclusions about the slavery controversy in the perspective of the al-aṣl fī al-abḍā' al-tahrīm rule. The results of the study reveal that in Islam the law of non-marital sexual intercourse or adultery has been regulated by Allah swt in the Qur'an and hadith absolutely, namely the law of lashing a hundred times or being exiled for a year for the adulterer ghairu muḥṣan (unmarried) and the law of stoning (married) for muan adulterers. So non-marital sexual relations are absolutely not allowed in the teachings of Islamic law, as the meaning of the rule of al-aṣl fī al-abḍā' al-tahrīm, namely the original law in jima 'or sexual relations between men and women are haram.

References

al-Bukhārī. Abū ‘Abdillāh Muḥammad bin Ismā’īl bin Ibrāhīm. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhāri. Juz 2. Cet. I. Dār Tauqi al-Najāh, 1422 H.

al-Jazairi, Abu Bakr Jabir. Konsep Hidup Ideal dalam Islam. Jakarta: Darul Haq, 2006.

Almaany. “Terjemahan Dan Arti Al-Aṣl”. Situs Resmi Almaany, https//www.almaany.com/id/dict/ar-id/الأصل/

al-Muṭalibi, Muhammad bin Ishāq bin Yasar. Sīrah Ibn Ishāq. Bayrut: Dār al-Fikr, 1978.

al-Sadlan, Shalih bin Ghanim, al-Qawa’id al-Fiqhiyyah al-Kubra wa Ma Tafarra’a ‘Anha. Riyadh: Dar Balensiah, t.th.

Amstrong, Karen, Muhammad Prophet for our time. Bandung: Mizan Media Utama, 2007.

Audah, Abdul Qadir. Ensiklopedi Hukum Pidana Islam. Cet I. Jakarta: Kharisma Ilmu, 2007.

Bassam, Abdullah Bin Abdurrahman Ali. Taisīr Al-‘Ālām Syarh Umdatul Ahkam. Cet. II. Qahirah: Darul Kutubil ‘Ilmiyyah, 2006.

Bikri, Cik Hasan. Model Penelitian Kitab Fikih. Cet. I. Bogor: Kencana, 2003.

Djamali, Abdul. Hukum Islam. Cet I. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1992.

Djazuli. Kaidah-Kaidah Fikih. Cet. VI. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2016.

Fatkhi, Rifqi Muhammad dan Lisalam, Reza Hudan. “Membumikan HAM Mengikis Perbudakan”. Refleksi 17, no. 2 (Juni, 2018): 254.

Hamka. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Juz XVII. Jakarta: Pustaka Panjimas, 1983.

Ibnu Kaṡīr, Abu al-Fidā’ Ismail bin ‘Amr. Tafsīr al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm. Juz.6. Bayrut: Dār Taybah, 1999.

Ibnu Manzur. Lisan Al-‘Arab. Cet. I. Kairo: Dar Al-Hadith, 2003.

Ibnu Qudāmah, Abu Muhammad Muwaffiq al-Dīn. al-Mughnī. Juz 10. Cet. I. Kairo: Maktabah al-Qāhirah, 1968.

Ibnu Rusyd, Muhammad bin Ahmad. Bidāyat al-Mujtahid wa Nihāyat al-Muqtaṣid. Jilid II. Jakarta: Akbar Media, 2013.

Manalu, Juli Etha Ramaida. “Perbudakan Modern”, Situs Bisnis.com, http://www.bisnis.com/perbudakan-modern (31 Mei 2016).

Muhammad, Agus. “Pesan Moral Perbudakan dalam Al-Qur’an”. Suhuf 4, no. 1 (Desember 2011): 65-76.

Muslim, al-Hajjaj ibnu Abu al-Ḥasan al-Qusyairī al-Naisābūrī. Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Cet. I. Kairo: al-Dar al-‘Alamiyyah, 1437 H/2016 M.

Nasution, Ahmad Sayuti Anshari. “Perbudakan dalam Hukum Islam”. Ahkam 17. no.1 (Juli, 2015): 187-196.

Nugroho, Adi, “5 Fakta Perbudakan Romawi Kuno”, Situs Resmi Boombastis, http://www.boombastis.com/perbudakan-zaman-romawi /73951 (16 April 2016).

Salvador, Therese, “Kita Harus Mengakhiri Perbudakan Modern di Laut”. Situs Greenpeace, http://www.greenpeace.org/kita-harus-mengakhiri-perbudakan-modern-dilaut (23 Agustus 2019).

Syafputri, Ella. "Apa Itu Perbudakan Modern”. Situs Antara News, http://www.antaranews.com/berita/46 (18 November 2014).

Ulwan, ‘Abdullah Nasih. Niẓām al-Riqq fī al-Islām. Cet. I. Kairo: Dār al-Salām, 2007.

Umar, Ibnu ‘Abdil ‘Aziz. “al-Riqq fī al-Islām”. Situs Alukah.net, http://www.Alukah.net/Sharia/0/75577 (6 Juni 2014).

Wāfi, ‘Ali ‘Abd al-Wahi. Huqūq al-Insān fī al-Islām. Kairo: Dār Nahdhah Mishr, 1979.

Wahid, Abdul Hakim. “Perbudakan dalam Pandangan Islam” Nuansa 8, no. 2 (Desember, 2015): 76-95.

Wikipedia, “Undang-undang Hammurabi”, Situs Resmi Wikipedia, http://www.wikipedia.com/undang-undang-hammurabi/ (3 April 2019).

Zaidan, Abdul Karim. Al-Wajiz Fī Syarh Al-Qawāid Al-Fiqhiyyah Fī Asy-Syarī’ah Al-Islā miyyah, Bairut: Muassasah Risalah, 2001

Published
2021-12-03
Statistic
Viewed: 46
Downloaded: 34
How to Cite
Asri, A., Fauziah Ramdani, Aswar, A., & Andi Ruqayyah Rahman. (2021). Kontroversi Perbudakan dalam Perspektif Kaidah al-Aṣl fī al- Abḍā’ al-Tahrīm. BUSTANUL FUQAHA: Jurnal Bidang Hukum Islam , 2(3), 457-471. https://doi.org/10.36701/bustanul.v2i3.409