Analisis Keabsahan Wasiat Kesaksian Fasik Perspektif Mazhab Hanafi dan Mazhab Syafii
Analysis of the Validity of a Will Witnessed by a Fasiq: Perspectives of the Hanafi and Shafi'i Schools of Thought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36701/mabsuth.v2i2.2498Keywords:
Validity, Will, Testimony of the Fasik, Hanafi, SyafiiAbstract
Wasiat is an important instrument in Islamic law related to the transfer of property after death. Problems arise when the witnesses presented are ungodly. This article aims to examine the validity of wills witnessed by ungodly people according to the views of the Hanafi and Syafii madhhabs, explain the legal istinbat method used by each madhhab, and analyze the points of difference between the two within the framework of Islamic law. This research is qualitative with a library research method and normative and fiqh approaches, to trace the legal arguments of the two madhhabs. The results show that: (1) The Hanafi school rejects the testimony of the wicked, but provides exceptions in emergency conditions, such as when there are no fair witnesses available, for example in cases of death in remote places. (2) The Shafi'i school of thought rejects the testimony of the wicked absolutely because it is considered not to meet the requirements of 'adālah, so that its testimony in the case of a will is considered invalid. (3) The Hanafi school uses a rational and contextual approach through istihsan and maslahat, making it more flexible in certain situations. In contrast, the Shafii school relies on a textual approach and emphasizes that 'adālah is an absolute requirement for testimony. This comparison shows that there is a fundamental difference in their legal approach to unlawful testimony in wills, which reflects their different views on social reality and the principles of justice in Islam.
Downloads
References
Al-Qur’ān al-Karīm.
Buku:
Ḥaṣkafī, Alī ibn Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī al-Dimasyq al-Ḥanafī. Al-Durr al-Mukhtār fī Syarḥ Tanwīr al-Abṣār. Juz 6. Cet. II; Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1992.
Ibn ʿĀbidīn, Muḥammad Amīn. Radd al-Muḥtār ʿalā al-Durr al-Mukhtār. Juz I. Cet. II; Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 2000.
Kementrian Agama R.I. Al-Qur’an Hafalan Mudah Terjemahan dan Tajwid Warna. Bandung: Cordoba, 2024.
Al-Kāsānī, Alā’ al-Dīn Abū Bakr ibn Mas’ūd. Badā’iʿ al-Ṣanā’iʿ fī Tartīb al-Syarā’iʿ. Juz 6. Cet. II; Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1986.
Al-Khaṭīb al-Syarbīnī, Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Mugnī al-Muḥtāj ilā Maʿrifat Maʿānī Alfāẓ al-Minhāj. Juz 3. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 1997.
Al-Khaṭīb al-Syarbīnī, Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Mugnī al-Muḥtāj ilā Maʿrifah Maʿānī Alfāẓ al-Minhāj. Juz 4. Cet. I; Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1994.
Al-Maqdisī, Abū Muḥammad Muwaffaq al-Dīn ʿAbd Allāh ibn Aḥmad ibn Muḥammad ibn Qudāmah. al-Mugnī. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1985.
Al-Nawawī, Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyā ibn Syaraf. Al-Majmūʿ Syarḥ al-Muhażżab. Juz 9. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 1997.
Al-Nawawī, Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyā ibn Syaraf. Minhāj al-Ṭālibīn wa ʿUmdat al-Muftīn fī al-Fiqh. Taḥqīq: ʿAwaḍ Qāsim Aḥmad ʿAwaḍ. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 2005.
Al-Nawawī, Abū Zakariyyā Yaḥyā ibn Syaraf. Rawḍat al-Ṭālibīn wa ʿUmdat al-Muftīn. Juz 5. Cet. I; Beirūt: al-Maktab al-Islāmī, 1991.
Al-Sa‘dī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān ibn Nāṣir. Taysīr al-Karīm al-Raḥmān fī Tafsīr Kalām al-Mannān. Cet. I; Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah, 1420 H/2000 M.
Al-Sarakhsī, Abū al-Ḥasan. Al-Mabsūṭ. Juz 10. Cet. I; Beirūt: Dār al-Maʿrifah, t.th.
Al-Sarkhasī, Abū Bakr Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad. Al-Mabsūṭ. Juz 16. Beirūt: Dār al-Fikr, 2000.
Al-Syāfiʿī, Muḥammad ibn Idrīs. Al-Risālah. Juz I. Cet. I; al-Qāhira: Maktabah wa Maṭba‘ah Muṣṭafā al-Ḥalabī wa Awlāduh, 1940.
Al-Ṭabarī, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. Jāmiʿ al-Bayān. Juz 3. Mekah: Dār al-Tarbiyah, t.th.
Al-Ṭabarī, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Jarīr. Jāmiʿ al-Bayān. Juz 11. Mekah: Dār al-Tarbiyah, t.th.
Al-Zuhailī, Wahbah. Al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Adillatuhū. Juz 8. Cet. 4; Dimasyq: Dār al-Fikr al-Muʿāṣir, 1997.
Jurnal Ilmiah:
Ezra Farrel Praditya, dkk. “Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Wasiat dan Waris dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf 3, no. 3 (2024): 20–29.
Hanska, and Max. “Normative analysis in the communications field: Why we should distinguish communicative means and ends of justice.” Journal of Information Policy 9 (2019): 56–78.
Joshua Lay. “Kedudukan Surat Wasiat (Testament) sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan yang Sah Menurut Pasal 875 KUH Perdata.” Lex Privatum 7, no. 3 (2019).
M. Sriastuti Agustina. “Tinjauan hukum surat wasiat dalam penyerahannya oleh orang lain ke notaris.” Yustitiabelen 6, no. 1 (2020).
Sidik, Parid. “Pendekatan Normatif sebagai Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Islam.” Al-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga 5, no. 3 (2023): 1010–1022.
Sri Novita Sarman. “Keabsahan Surat Hibah Wasiat yang Dibuat di Hadapan Kepala Desa dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Warisan.” Lex Administratum 10, no. 5 (2022).
Suharto, dkk. “Konsep Al-Qur'an sebagai Sumber Utama dalam Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani 2, no. 2 (2022): 955–976.
Umar Haris Sanjaya. “Kedudukan Wasiat terhadap Harta Warisan yang belum Dibagikan kepada Ahli Waris.” Jurnal Yuridis 5, no. 1 (2018).
Skripsi, Tesis, dan Disertasi:
Amalia, Melisa. “Keabsahan Surat Wasiat yang Ditandatangani Saksi Non Muslim Studi Perbandingan Mazhab Hanafi dan Mazhab Syafii”. Skripsi. Banda Aceh: Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, 2018.






