Manhaj Ibn Hibban dalam Kitab al-Ṡiqāt (Kritik Rijāl al-Ḥadīṡ Kategori Majhūl)
The Methodogy of Ibn Hibban in Kitab al-Ṡiqāt (Criticism of Rijāl al-Ḥadīs in Majhūl Category)
Abstract
This study examined Ibn Hibban's manhaj in his work al-Ṡiqāt, with a particular emphasis on his criticism of rijāl al-hadīs majhūl category. This research utilized a historical and philosophical method, using data sources including Ibn Hibban's work al-Ṡiqāt, as well as additional books, books, and articles that explore al-jarḥ wa al-ta'dīl. The data were gathered from representative references, identified, selected, and cited based on their relevance to the issue, and then examined utilizing content analysis and comparison approaches. The findings of this analysis suggested that Ibn Hibban considered 'adālah to be the fundamental nature of a Muslim, such that if a narrator was not jarhed, 'adālah was what applied to him. Parts scholars believed that some of Ibn Hibban's evaluations in al-Ṡiqāt were accurate, while others believed they were not. This was because Ibn Hibban's rules contradicted the jumhur in determining the justice of a narrator, and there was a contradiction between Ibn Hibban's statement in al-Ṡiqāt and his practice, in which Ibn Hibban included narrators who he himself determined were not ṡiqah under various categories and for a specific purpose. In contrast to Ibn Hibban's manhaj, Ibn Hibban included the narrators of the majhūl in al-Ṡiqāt since they were not plundered.
Downloads
References
al-Alba>ni, Abu ’Abd al-Rah}ma>n Muh}ammad Na>s}ir al-Di>n bin al-H}a>j Nu>h}. S}ah}i>h} Mawa>rid Al-Z}ama>n Ila Zawa>id Ibn H}ibba>n. Cet. I. Riya>d}: Da>r al-S}ami’i, n.d.
———. Silsilah Al-Ah}a>di>s\ Al-D}a’i>fah Al-Maud}u>’ah Wa As\aruha Al-Sayyi’ Fi Al-Ummah. Cet. I. Riya>d}: Da>r al-Ma’a>rif, 1992.
al-’Asqala>ni, Abu al-Fad}l Ah}mad bin ’Ali bin H}ajar. Lisa>n Al-Mi>za>n. Cet. II. Bairu>t: Muassasah al-A’lami, 1971.
———. Nuzhah Al-Naz}r Fi Taud}ih} Nukhbah Al-Fikr Fi Mus}t}alah} Ahl Al-As\r. Cet. I. Riya>d}: Mat}ba’ah Safi>r, 2002.
al-Bagda>di, Ah}mad bin ’Ali bin S|abit Al-Khat}i>b. Al-Kifa>yah Fi ’Ilm Al-Riwa>yah. Madinah: al-Maktabah al-’Ilmiyyah, n.d.
al-Busti, Abu Hatim Muh}ammad bin H}ibba>n bin Ahmad. Al-Majru>hi>n. Cet. I. H}alab: Da>r al-Wa’i, 1975.
———. Al-S|iqa>t. Cet. I. India: Da>irah al-Ma’a>rif al-’Us\ma>niyyah, 1973.
al-Fa>risi, al-Ami>r ’Ala al-Di>n ’Ali bin Balba>n. Al-Ih}sa>n Fi> Taqri>b S}ah}i>h} Ibn H}ibba>n. Cet. I. Bairu>t: Muassasah al-Risa>lah, 1988.
al-H}anbali, Syams al-Di>n Muh}ammad bin Ah}mad bin ’Abd al-Ha>di. Al-S]A>rim Al-Munki Fi Al-Radd ’ala Al-Busti. Cet. I. Lubna>n: Muassasah al-Rayya>n, 2003.
al-H}imawi, Syiha>b al-Di>n Abu ’Abdilla>h Ya>qu>t bin ’Abdillah. Mu’jam Al-Bulda>n. Cet. II. Bairu>t: Da>r S}a>dir, 1995.
al-H}imsy, ’Adda>b bin Mah}mu>d. Ruwa>h Al-H}adi>s\ Allaz\i>n Sakat ’Alaihim Aimmah Al-Jarh} Wa Al-Ta’di>l Bain Al-Taus\i>q Wa Al-Tajhi>l. Cet. II. Riya>d}: Da>r al-Ama>ni, 1987.
al-Laknawi, Muh}ammad ’Abd al-H}ayy bin Muh}ammad ’Abd al-H}ali>m Abu al-H}asana>t. Al-Raf’ Wa Al-Takmi>l Fi Al-Jarh} Wa Al-Ta’di>l. Cet. III. H}alab: Maktab al-Mat}bu’a>t al-Isla>miyyah, 1987.
al-Maqri>zi, Ah}mad bin ’Ali bin ’Abd al-Qa>dir Abu al-’Abba>s Taqi al-Di>n. Mukhtas}ar Al-Ka>mil Fi Al-D}u’afa>’. Cet. I. Mis}r: Maktabah al-Sunnah, 1994.
al-Mu’allimi, Abd al-Rah}ma>n bin Yah}ya bin ’Ali. Al-Tanki>l Bi Ma Fi Ta’ni>b Al-Kaus\ari Min Al-Aba>t}i>l. Cet. II. t.t.: al-Maktab al-Isla>mi, 1986.
al-Sakha>wi, Syams al-Di>n Abu al-Khair Muh}ammad bin ’Abd al-Rah}man. Fath} Al-Mugi>s\ Bi Syarh} Alfiyah Al-H}adi>s\ Li Al-’Ira>qi. Cet. I. Mis}r: Maktabah al-Sunnah, 2003.
Taim, As’ad Sa>lim. ’Ilm T}abaqa>t Al-Muh}addis\i>n. Cet. I. Riya>d}: Maktabah al-Rusyd, 1994.
al-Z|ahabi, Syams al-Di>n Abu ’Abdilla>h Muh}ammad bin Ah}mad. Mi>za>n Al-I’tida>l Fi Naqd Al-Rija>l. Cet. I. Lubna>n: Da>r al-Ma’rifah, 1963.
———. Siyar A’la>m Al-Nubala>. al-Qa>hirah: Da>r al-H}adi>s\, 2006.
Copyright (c) 2022 Arfan Arfan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.